Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.
BMJ Quality and Safety
BMJ Publishing Group
This is the final version of an open access article available from BMJ via the DOI in this record. Distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/
OBJECTIVES: Uncertainties exist about when and how best to adjust performance measures for case mix. Our aims are to quantify the impact of case-mix adjustment on practice-level scores in a national survey of patient experience, to identify why and when it may be useful to adjust for case mix, and to discuss unresolved policy issues regarding the use of case-mix adjustment in performance measurement in health care. DESIGN/SETTING: Secondary analysis of the 2009 English General Practice Patient Survey. Responses from 2 163 456 patients registered with 8267 primary care practices. Linear mixed effects models were used with practice included as a random effect and five case-mix variables (gender, age, race/ethnicity, deprivation, and self-reported health) as fixed effects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the impact of case-mix adjustment on practice-level means (adjusted minus unadjusted) and changes in practice percentile ranks for questions measuring patient experience in three domains of primary care: access; interpersonal care; anticipatory care planning, and overall satisfaction with primary care services. RESULTS: Depending on the survey measure selected, case-mix adjustment changed the rank of between 0.4% and 29.8% of practices by more than 10 percentile points. Adjusting for case-mix resulted in large increases in score for a small number of practices and small decreases in score for a larger number of practices. Practices with younger patients, more ethnic minority patients and patients living in more socio-economically deprived areas were more likely to gain from case-mix adjustment. Age and race/ethnicity were the most influential adjustors. CONCLUSIONS: While its effect is modest for most practices, case-mix adjustment corrects significant underestimation of scores for a small proportion of practices serving vulnerable patients and may reduce the risk that providers would 'cream-skim' by not enrolling patients from vulnerable socio-demographic groups.
The study was funded by a grant from the UK Department of Health
Vol. 21, pp. 634 - 640
PubMed Central ID
Place of publication
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Patient initiated clinics for patients with chronic or recurrent conditions managed in secondary care: a systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient and clinician satisfaction Whear, R; Abdul-Rahman, AK; Thompson-Coon, J; Boddy, K; Perry, MG; Stein, K (BioMed Central, 2013-12-01)BACKGROUND: The cost to the NHS of missed or inappropriate hospital appointments is considerable. Alternative methods of appointment scheduling might be more flexible to patients' needs without jeopardising health and ...
Identifying patient-centred recommendations for improving patient safety in General Practices in England: a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses using the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire. Ricci-Cabello, I; Saletti-Cuesta, L; Slight, SP; Valderas, JM (Wiley Open Access, 2017-02-28)BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in identifying strategies to achieve safer primary health-care provision. However, most of the research conducted so far in this area relies on information supplied by health-care ...
Understanding high and low patient experience scores in primary care: analysis of patients' survey data for general practices and individual doctors. Roberts, Martin; Campbell, John; Abel, GA; Davey, Antoinette; Elmore, NL; Maramba, I; Carter, M; Elliott, MN; Roland, MO; Burt, JA (BMJ Publishing Group, 2014-11-11)OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which practice level scores mask variation in individual performance between doctors within a practice. DESIGN: Analysis of postal survey of patients' experience of face-to-face ...