dc.contributor.author | Cox, DTC | |
dc.contributor.author | Hudson, HL | |
dc.contributor.author | Shanahan, DF | |
dc.contributor.author | Fuller, RA | |
dc.contributor.author | Gaston, KJ | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-14T13:55:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-01-02 | |
dc.description.abstract | As people live more urbanised lifestyles there is potential to lose daily contact with nature,
diminishing access to the wide range of associated health benefits of interacting with nature.
Experiences of nature vary widely across populations, but this variation is poorly understood.
We surveyed 1,023 residents of an urban population in the UK to measure four distinctly
different nature interactions: indirect (viewing nature through a window at work and at home),
incidental (spending time outside at work), intentional (time spent in private gardens) and
intentional (time spent in public parks). Scaled-up to the whole study population, accumulation
curves of the total number of hours per week that people were exposed to each type of nature
interaction showed that 75% of nature interactions were experienced by half the population.
Moreover, 75% of the interactions of a type where people were actually present in nature were
experienced by just 32% of the population. The average hours each individual experienced
nature per week varied across interactions: indirect (46.0 ± 27.3 SD), incidental (6.4 ± 12.7 SD),
intentional-gardens (2.5 ± 2.9 SD) and intentional-parks (2.3 ± 2.7 SD). Experiencing nature
regularly appears to be the exception rather than the norm, with a person’s connection to nature
being positively associated with incidental and intentional experiences. This novel study
provides baseline information regarding how an urban population experiences different types of
nature. Deconstructing nature experience will pave the way for developing recommendations for
targeted health outcomes. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | DTCC, HLH & KJG were funded by NERC grant NE/J015237/1. D.F.S. is supported
through ARC Discovery Grant DP120102857 and the Centre of Excellence for
Environmental Decisions (CEED, Australia); R.A.F. holds an ARC Future Fellowship. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 160, April 2017, pp. 79–84 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.006 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/24858 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | |
dc.title | The rarity of direct experiences of nature in an urban population | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-2046 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. | |
dc.identifier.journal | Landscape and Urban Planning | en_GB |