Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCiani, O
dc.contributor.authorWilcher, B
dc.contributor.authorBlankart, CR
dc.contributor.authorHatz, M
dc.contributor.authorRupel, VP
dc.contributor.authorErker, RS
dc.contributor.authorVarabyova, Y
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RS
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-09T11:46:57Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-05
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review and compare current health technology assessment (HTA) activities for medical devices across non-European Union HTA agencies. METHODS: HTA activities for medical devices were evaluated from three perspectives: organizational structure, processes, and methods. Agencies were primarily selected upon membership of existing HTA networks. The data collection was performed in two stages: stage 1-agency Web-site assessment using a standardized questionnaire, followed by review and validation of the collected data by a representative of the agency; and stage 2-semi-structured telephone interviews with key informants of a sub-sample of agencies. RESULTS: In total, thirty-six HTA agencies across twenty non-EU countries assessing medical devices were included. Twenty-seven of thirty-six (75 percent) agencies were judged at stage 1 to have adopted HTA-specific approaches for medical devices (MD-specific agencies) that were largely organizational or procedural. There appeared to be few differences in the organization, process and methods between MD-specific and non-MD-specific agencies. Although the majority (69 percent) of both categories of agency had specific methods guidance or policy for evidence submission, only one MD-specific agency had developed methodological guidelines specific to medical devices. In stage 2, many MD-specific agencies cited insufficient resources (budget, skilled employees), lack of coordination (between regulator and reimbursement bodies), and the inability to generalize findings from evidence synthesis to be key challenges in the HTA of medical devices. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of evidence for differentiation in scientific methods for HTA of devices raises the question of whether HTA needs to develop new methods for medical devices but rather adapt existing methodological approaches. In contrast, organizational and/or procedural adaptation of existing HTA agency frameworks to accommodate medical devices appear relatively commonplace.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a research grant from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7 - HEALTH Grant Agreement no. 305694). The sponsor had no role in the study design, collection and analysis of data, writing of the report, or submission of the paper for publication. The authors wish to thank all interviewees and agencies’ assessment forms verifiers for their invaluable contribution to the completion of this study.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 31, Iss. 3, pp. 154 - 165en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0266462315000185
dc.identifier.otherS0266462315000185
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/25114
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26044729en_GB
dc.rightsCOPYRIGHT: © Cambridge University Press 2015. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectHealth technology assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectMedical devicesen_GB
dc.subjectReimbursementen_GB
dc.subjectDecision Makingen_GB
dc.subjectEquipment and Suppliesen_GB
dc.subjectHealth Policyen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectTechnology Assessment, Biomedicalen_GB
dc.titleHealth technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-01-09T11:46:57Z
dc.identifier.issn0266-4623
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1471-6348
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Careen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record