Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, Qiang
dc.contributor.authorKucukkoc, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorZhang, David Z.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:04:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-25
dc.description.abstractAdditive manufacturing is a new and emerging technology and has been shown to be the future of manufacturing systems. Because of the high purchasing and processing costs of additive manufacturing machines, the planning and scheduling of parts to be processed on these machines play a vital role in reducing operational costs, providing service to customers with less price and increasing the profitability of companies which provide such services. However, this topic has not yet been studied in the literature, although cost functions have been developed to calculate the average production cost per volume of material for additive manufacturing machines. In an environment where there are machines with different specifications (i.e. production time and cost per volume of material, processing time per unit height, set-up time, maximum supported area and height, etc.) and parts in different heights, areas and volumes, allocation of parts to machines in different sets or groups to minimize the average production cost per volume of material constitutes an interesting and challenging research problem. This paper defines the problem for the first time in the literature and proposes a mathematical model to formulate it. The mathematical model is coded in CPLEX and two different heuristic procedures, namely ‘best-fit’ and ‘adapted best-fit’ rules, are developed in JavaScript. Solution-building mechanisms of the proposed heuristics are explained stepwise through examples. A numerical example is also given, for which an optimum solution and heuristic solutions are provided in detail, for illustration. Test problems are created and a comprehensive experimental study is conducted to test the performance of the heuristics. Experimental tests indicate that both heuristics provide promising results. The necessity of planning additive manufacturing machines in reducing processing costs is also verified.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 83, pp. 157-172en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cor.2017.01.013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/25462
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/17360en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policyen_GB
dc.subjectproduction planningen_GB
dc.subjectadditive manufacturingen_GB
dc.subject3D printingen_GB
dc.subjectschedulingen_GB
dc.subjectoperations managementen_GB
dc.subjectoptimizationen_GB
dc.titleProduction planning in additive manufacturing and 3D printing (article)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0305-0548
dc.descriptionData availability: This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionAccompanying dataset is available via: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/17360en_GB
dc.identifier.journalComputers and Operations Researchen_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-01-24
refterms.dateFOA2018-07-24T23:00:00Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record