Drivers and predictions of coral reef carbonate budget trajectories
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
© 2017 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited
Climate change is one of the greatest threats to the long-term maintenance of coral-dominated tropical ecosystems, and has received considerable attention over the past two decades. Coral bleaching and associated mortality events, which are predicted to become more frequent and intense, can alter the balance of different elements that are responsible for coral reef growth and maintenance. The geomorphic impacts of coral mass mortality have received relatively little attention, particularly questions concerning temporal recovery of reef carbonate production and the factors that promote resilience of reef growth potential. Here, we track the biological carbonate budgets of inner Seychelles reefs from 1994 to 2014, spanning the 1998 global bleaching event when these reefs lost more than 90% of coral cover. All 21 reefs had positive budgets in 1994, but in 2005 budgets were predominantly negative. By 2014, carbonate budgets on seven reefs were comparable with 1994, but on all reefs where an ecological regime shift to macroalgal dominance occurred, budgets remained negative through 2014. Reefs with higher massive coral cover, lower macroalgae cover and lower excavating parrotfish biomass in 1994 were more likely to have positive budgets post-bleaching. If mortality of corals from the 2016 bleaching event is as severe as that of 1998, our predictions based on past trends would suggest that six of eight reefs with positive budgets in 2014 would still have positive budgets by 2030. Our results highlight that reef accretion and framework maintenance cannot be assumed from the ecological state alone, and that managers should focus on conserving aspects of coral reefs that support resilient carbonate budgets.
This work was funded by the Leverhulme Trust, Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association and the Australian Research Council. During this work F.A.J.-H. was supported through an Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) grant ‘Sustainable Poverty Alleviation from Coastal Ecosystem Services (SPACES)’ (project NE-K010484-1). N.A.J.G. was supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship. C.T.P. was supported by a Leverhulme Trust Research Fellowship (RF-2015-152).
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.
Vol. 284, 20162533