Introduction: Polymorphic Borders
Territory, Politics, Goverance
Taylor & Francis for Regional Studies Association
Reason for embargo
This is the author accepted manuscript. It is currently under an indefinite embargo pending publication by Taylor & Francis
Conceptualizing the respatialization, rescaling, and mobilization of borderwork is a central problem in current borders research. Traditional and ubiquitous border concepts imply a coherent state power belied by much contemporary research In this introduction to the special issue on “Polyphorphic Borders,” we suggest that not only do empirical studies of border work reveal a much more fragmented and chaotic world of bordering, that is more guided by site- and agent-specific contingencies than by grand schemes, but that representing borders as ubiquitous calls forth the state as coherent, monstrous, omnipotent and omniscient. Rather than being either strictly tied to the territorial margins of the states or ubiquitous throughout the entire territory of states, bordering takes on a variety of forms, agents, sites, practices, and targets. We propose reconceptualising borders as polymorphic, or taking on a multiplicity of mutually non-exclusive forms at the same time (Jones, 2016). In this introduction, we propose the metaphor of polymorphic borders in order to account for the respatialization of border work beyond and within traditional borders in a way that avoids viewing borders as either lines, or everywhere. The articles that follow elaborate polymorphic borders through ethnographic investigations of border work at various sites and scales.
Andrew Burridge and Nick Gill acknowledge the support of the Economic and Social Research Council, grant number ES/J023426/1. Lauren Martin was supported by Academy of Finland Postdoctoral Research Grant #268596. We thank John Agnew and two reviewers for their constructive comments; any errors remain our own.