dc.contributor.author | Winder, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Richards, SH | |
dc.contributor.author | Campbell, JL | |
dc.contributor.author | Richards, DA | |
dc.contributor.author | Dickens, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Gandhi, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Wright, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Turner, K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-06T11:01:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-02-13 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background
Patients who experience a cardiac event are at higher risk of developing depression than the general population. Despite this, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes do not provide a systematic approach to psychological care for depression. The CADENCE study aimed to develop and pilot an enhanced psychological care (EPC) intervention consisting of behavioural activation (BA) and mental health care coordination. Following original research commissioning guidance, the intervention was planned to be embedded in routine care and delivered by CR nurses to patients with depression attending CR. This paper describes how qualitative methods were used to develop, embed and refine the intervention.
Methods
This feasibility study involved three CR teams. Observations were made of CR nurses delivering usual care, of EPC training given to nurses, and of supervision sessions provided to the CR nurses. Four nurses were interviewed shortly after their EPC training, and three were interviewed again 6–7 months later having delivered EPC to patients. All nine patients recruited to receive EPC were interviewed. Analyses of the observation notes and interview transcripts focused on how the intervention could be improved in terms of its acceptability and implementation.
Results
Variations were found between the CR teams regarding patient waiting list times, how CR was delivered, what facilities were available and how many CR sessions were offered to patients. EPC was acceptable to both nurses and patients. However, nurses struggled to provide this additional care within their existing workload and resources, and patients’ disrupted progression through the CR programme affected EPC delivery. Limited time and availability of private space meant nurses also delivered EPC by telephone, which was viewed as a pragmatic solution but less preferable than face-to-face. Nurses indicated that patients struggled with some of the written materials. Findings were used to revise the intervention to become a protocol of care coordination which included guided self-help BA.
Conclusions
Insights gained through conducting interviews and observations enabled us to identify barriers to the implementation of EPC, and to modify the intervention to facilitate its delivery within existing services whilst remaining acceptable to both nurses and patients. The multiple method, iterative approach used was key to the success of this qualitative study. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This project was funded by the UK NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 12/189/06) and the over-arching study, including qualitative methods and a pilot trial, is registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN34701576; registered 29/05/2014). The Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust is acting as trial sponsor. The Funding Agency and Trial sponsors have not been substantively involved in the design, or data acquisition for this research, nor the drafting of this manuscript; the views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Health Technology Assessment Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.
JC, CD, DAR and SHR are centrally funded by the University of Exeter Medical School. KT is funded by the University of Bristol and her time is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (CLAHRC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust. MG is funded by the Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. RW and CW were previously employed on the above funding award. DAR and CD are also supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula, and additionally CD is funded by Devon Partnership Trust. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 3 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s40814-017-0123-1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/26239 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. | en_GB |
dc.title | Development and refinement of a complex intervention within cardiac rehabilitation services: experiences from the CADENCE feasibility study | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-06T11:01:21Z | |
dc.description | Published online | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the final version of the article. Available from BioMed Central via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2055-5784 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Pilot and Feasibility Studies | en_GB |