Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, GC
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, RA
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, D
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-09T14:06:04Z
dc.date.issued2012-06-27
dc.description.abstractBovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, continues to be a serious economic problem for the British cattle industry. The Eurasian badger (Meles meles) is partly responsible for maintenance of the disease and its transmission to cattle. Previous attempts to manage the disease by culling badgers have been hampered by social perturbation, which in some situations is associated with increases in the cattle herd incidence of bTB. Following the licensing of an injectable vaccine, we consider the relative merits of management strategies to reduce bTB in badgers, and thereby reduce cattle herd incidence. We used an established simulation model of the badger-cattle-TB system and investigated four proposed strategies: business as usual with no badger management, large-scale proactive badger culling, badger vaccination, and culling with a ring of vaccination around it. For ease of comparison with empirical data, model treatments were applied over 150 km(2) and were evaluated over the whole of a 300 km(2) area, comprising the core treatment area and a ring of approximately 2 km. The effects of treatment were evaluated over a 10-year period comprising treatment for five years and the subsequent five year period without treatment. Against a background of existing disease control measures, where 144 cattle herd incidents might be expected over 10 years, badger culling prevented 26 cattle herd incidents while vaccination prevented 16. Culling in the core 150 km(2) plus vaccination in a ring around it prevented about 40 cattle herd breakdowns by partly mitigating the negative effects of culling, although this approach clearly required greater effort. While model outcomes were robust to uncertainty in parameter estimates, the outcomes of culling were sensitive to low rates of land access for culling, low culling efficacy, and the early cessation of a culling strategy, all of which were likely to lead to an overall increase in cattle disease.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding: The UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra, http://ww2.defra.gov.uk/) funded this work. Defra designed the three strategies to investigate, but had no role in data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 7 (6), article e39250en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0039250
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/26387
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22761746en_GB
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2012 Smith et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.subjectAnimalsen_GB
dc.subjectCattleen_GB
dc.subjectDisease Reservoirsen_GB
dc.subjectEnglanden_GB
dc.subjectIncidenceen_GB
dc.subjectMustelidaeen_GB
dc.subjectMycobacterium bovisen_GB
dc.subjectTuberculosis, Bovineen_GB
dc.subjectVaccinationen_GB
dc.titleComparing badger (Meles meles) management strategies for reducing tuberculosis incidence in cattleen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-03-09T14:06:04Z
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited Statesen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Public Library of Science via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Oneen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record