Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOrfanos, S
dc.contributor.authorAkther, SF
dc.contributor.authorAbdul-Basit, M
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, R
dc.contributor.authorPriebe, S
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-16T14:25:50Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-10
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Research has shown that interactions in group therapies for people with schizophrenia are associated with a reduction in negative symptoms. However, it is unclear which specific interactions in groups are linked with these improvements. The aims of this exploratory study were to i) develop and test the reliability of using video-annotation software to measure interactions in group therapies in schizophrenia and ii) explore the relationship between interactions in group therapies for schizophrenia with clinically relevant changes in negative symptoms. METHODS: Video-annotation software was used to annotate interactions from participants selected across nine video-recorded out-patient therapy groups (N = 81). Using the Individual Group Member Interpersonal Process Scale, interactions were coded from participants who demonstrated either a clinically significant improvement (N = 9) or no change (N = 8) in negative symptoms at the end of therapy. Interactions were measured from the first and last sessions of attendance (>25 h of therapy). Inter-rater reliability between two independent raters was measured. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between the frequency of interactive behaviors and changes in negative symptoms, assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. RESULTS: Of the 1275 statements that were annotated using ELAN, 1191 (93%) had sufficient audio and visual quality to be coded using the Individual Group Member Interpersonal Process Scale. Rater-agreement was high across all interaction categories (>95% average agreement). A higher frequency of self-initiated statements measured in the first session was associated with improvements in negative symptoms. The frequency of questions and giving advice measured in the first session of attendance was associated with improvements in negative symptoms; although this was only a trend. CONCLUSION: Video-annotation software can be used to reliably identify interactive behaviors in groups for schizophrenia. The results suggest that proactive communicative gestures, as assessed by the video-analysis, predict outcomes. Future research should use this novel method in larger and clinically different samples to explore which aspects of therapy facilitate such proactive communication early on in therapy.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant from the East London NHS Foundation Trust.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 17, article 65en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12888-017-1217-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/26636
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183293en_GB
dc.rightsOpen Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectGroup Therapyen_GB
dc.subjectGroup processesen_GB
dc.subjectInteractionsen_GB
dc.subjectNegative Symptomsen_GB
dc.subjectOutcomesen_GB
dc.subjectSchizophreniaen_GB
dc.subjectVideo-analysisen_GB
dc.subjectVideo-annotationen_GB
dc.titleUsing video-annotation software to identify interactions in group therapies for schizophrenia: assessing reliability and associations with outcomesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-03-16T14:25:50Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from BioMed Central via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Psychiatryen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record