Intervertebral Disc Stress and Pressure in Different Daily Postures: A Finite Element Study
Zanjani-pour, Sahand
Date: 10 August 2016
Publisher
University of Exeter
Degree Title
PhD in Physics
Abstract
Low back pain is the most common cause of disability in the United Kingdom
with health care costs of more than 1 billion pounds per year. One reason associated
with low back pain is the degeneration of intervertebral discs due to loads on
the spine. Daily postures such as standing and sitting produce different loads on
the discs. ...
Low back pain is the most common cause of disability in the United Kingdom
with health care costs of more than 1 billion pounds per year. One reason associated
with low back pain is the degeneration of intervertebral discs due to loads on
the spine. Daily postures such as standing and sitting produce different loads on
the discs. Previously, many studies investigated the stress and pressure within
the disc in these postures. The results do not agree with each other and the
experiments have many limitations.
The aim of this project was to assess the feasibility of incorporating magnetic
resonance (MR) imaging and finite element (FE) analysis to predict the pressure
and stresses developed by different daily postures in an individual.
Transient and non-transient subject specific 2D models of nine individuals in
standing and sitting were created based on previously acquired MR images. The
geometry of these FE models was based on supine MR images. The sitting and
standing boundary conditions were calculated by comparing their MR images with
the supine posture. The results showed that for six subjects sitting created more
intradiscal pressure compared to standing and in one subject standing more than
sitting. For two of the subjects the pressure was nearly the same in sitting and
standing.
Because of the 2D model’s limitations, 3D models of an individual were developed.
Both transient and non-transient models of the individual were created. The
intradiscal pressure results were three times lower compared to the 2D models.
This was due to consideration of out of plane deformation in the 3D models. These
results were in the range of in-vivo and in-vitro measurements available in the
literature.
In conclusion, it was possible to create kinematic transient subject specific
FE models based on the MR images in different postures. 2D models provide a
method for comparing the postures but 3D models may be more realistic.
Doctoral Theses
Doctoral College
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0