Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomaidis, K
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-31T08:37:56Z
dc.date.issued2014-03-01
dc.description.abstractAs a specific object of interest for philosophy, the human voice is grasped within a system of signification that subordinates speech to the concept. It is in the traditional dualism between the vocal/aural and the conceptual/seen that Cavarero postulates the de-vocalization of logos, the dichotomy between embodied phonation and critical enquiry. Her remarks invite further probing of the pedagogy and creative praxis of voice: how do we conceptualize voicing? How does voice emerge from and reflect back to its discursive domains? How can we bridge the chasm between the ontology and epistemology of voice? How do we think, do and disseminate voice? In reflecting on these concerns, our overall aspiration is to propose a new paradigm for practice as research (PaR) education in Voice Studies.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 8, No. 1, pp. 77 - 87en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1386/smt.8.1.77_1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/26875
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIntellecten_GB
dc.subjectvoiceen_GB
dc.subjectvoice studiesen_GB
dc.subjectpractice as researchen_GB
dc.subjectAdriana Cavareroen_GB
dc.subjectvoice trainingen_GB
dc.subjectlogosen_GB
dc.subjectphoneen_GB
dc.titleThe revocalization of logos? Thinking, doing and disseminating voiceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-03-31T08:37:56Z
dc.identifier.issn1750-3159
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionArticleen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Intellect via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalStudies in Musical Theatreen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record