Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUkoumunne, OC
dc.contributor.authorVaidya, B
dc.contributor.authorFrost, J
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, R
dc.contributor.authorArgyle, C
dc.contributor.authorDaly, M
dc.contributor.authorHarris-Golesworthy, F
dc.contributor.authorHarris, J
dc.contributor.authorGibson, A
dc.contributor.authorIngram, W
dc.contributor.authorPinkney, J
dc.contributor.authorVickery, J
dc.contributor.authorBritten, N
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-02T13:05:58Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-07
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of running a randomised controlled trial of a preconsultation web-based intervention (Presenting Asking Checking Expressing (PACE-D)) to improve the quality of care and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes. DESIGN AND SETTING: A feasibility study (with randomisation) conducted at outpatient diabetes clinics at two secondary care hospitals in Devon, UK. PARTICIPANTS: People with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) attending secondary care general diabetes outpatient clinics. INTERVENTION: The PACE-D, a web-based tool adapted for patients with diabetes to use before their consultation to generate an agenda of topics to discuss with their diabetologist. OUTCOMES: The percentage of eligible patients who were recruited and the percentage of participants for whom routine glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) data (the putative primary outcome) could be extracted from medical notes and who completed secondary outcome assessments via questionnaire at follow-up were reported. RESULTS: In contrast with the planned recruitment of 120 participants, only 71 participants were randomised during the 7-month recruitment period. This comprised 18.7% (95% CI 14.9% to 23.0%) of those who were eligible. Mean (SD) age of the participants was 56.5 (12.4) years and 66.2% had type 1 diabetes. Thirty-eight patients were randomised to the intervention arm and 33 to the control arm. HbA1c data were available for only 73% (95% CI 61% to 83%) of participants at the 6 months follow-up. The questionnaire-based data were collected for 66% (95% CI 54% to 77%) of the participants at 6 months follow-up. Participants reported that the PACE-D tool was easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: A randomised controlled trial of the preconsultation web-based intervention as set out in our current protocol is not feasible without significant modification to improve recruitment and follow-up of participants. The study also provides insights into the feasibility and challenges of conducting complex intervention trials in everyday clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN75070242.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research question was generated from a research prioritisation exercise undertaken by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC) and the Patient and Public Involvement Group (PenPIG). The authors are grateful to Andy Barton (Research Design Service South West) for advice provided when developing the proposal. The authors would like to thank the study sponsor: Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. They are grateful to Donald Cegala (Emeritus Professor of Communication and Family Medicine, Ohio State University) for supporting their use and modification of the PACE intervention. They are grateful to Cosmo White for formatting images for the paper.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 7, article e013519en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013519
dc.identifier.otherbmjopen-2016-013519
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/27328
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28270389en_GB
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectdiabetesen_GB
dc.subjectpatient enablementen_GB
dc.subjectpre-consultationen_GB
dc.subjectself-managementen_GB
dc.titleA preconsultation web-based tool to generate an agenda for discussion in diabetes outpatient clinics to improve patient outcomes (DIAT): a feasibility studyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-05-02T13:05:58Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-02-10
rioxxterms.versionVoR
refterms.dateFCD2017-05-02T13:05:58Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/