dc.contributor.author | Fawcett, TW | |
dc.contributor.author | Mowles, SL | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-08T11:56:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-10-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | Highlights
• We dispute claims that assessing relative fighting ability is cognitively complex.
• Very simple mechanisms allow sensitivity to own and/or opponent fighting ability.
• Correlational approaches are of limited use in distinguishing forms of assessment.
• We should expect continuous variation in both self- and opponent assessment.
• Assessment strategies may change dynamically with age, role and contest phase. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | T.W.F. was supported by the European Research Council (Advanced Grant 250209 to Alasdair Houston) and S.L.M. by a University of Nottingham Anne McLaren Fellowship. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 86 (5), pp. e1–e7 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.033 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/27868 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Masson | en_GB |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_GB |
dc.subject | aggression | en_GB |
dc.subject | Lloyd Morgan's canon | en_GB |
dc.subject | mutual assessment | en_GB |
dc.subject | pure self-assessment | en_GB |
dc.subject | resource-holding potential | en_GB |
dc.subject | sequential assessment model | en_GB |
dc.title | Assessments of fighting ability need not be cognitively complex | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-08T11:56:04Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-3472 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Animal Behaviour | en_GB |