Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFawcett, TW
dc.contributor.authorMowles, SL
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-08T11:56:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-04
dc.description.abstractHighlights • We dispute claims that assessing relative fighting ability is cognitively complex. • Very simple mechanisms allow sensitivity to own and/or opponent fighting ability. • Correlational approaches are of limited use in distinguishing forms of assessment. • We should expect continuous variation in both self- and opponent assessment. • Assessment strategies may change dynamically with age, role and contest phase.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipT.W.F. was supported by the European Research Council (Advanced Grant 250209 to Alasdair Houston) and S.L.M. by a University of Nottingham Anne McLaren Fellowship.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 86 (5), pp. e1–e7en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.033
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/27868
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_GB
dc.rightsCopyright © 2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_GB
dc.subjectaggressionen_GB
dc.subjectLloyd Morgan's canonen_GB
dc.subjectmutual assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectpure self-assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectresource-holding potentialen_GB
dc.subjectsequential assessment modelen_GB
dc.titleAssessments of fighting ability need not be cognitively complexen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-06-08T11:56:04Z
dc.identifier.issn0003-3472
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalAnimal Behaviouren_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record