dc.contributor.author | Green, SM | |
dc.contributor.author | Baird, AJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Holden, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Reed, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Birch, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, P | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-13T11:46:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-04-13 | |
dc.description.abstract | We studied the effect of ditch blocking on vegetation composition and water-table depths in a blanket peatland. Measurements were made for a period of four years (water tables) and five years (vegetation) in the inter-ditch areas of three experimental treatments: (i) open ditches, (ii) ditches blocked with closely-spaced dams and (iii) ditches partially infilled with peat and blocked with dams. It is often assumed that ditch blocking will lead to an increase in the abundance of Sphagnum and, potentially, a reduction in the abundance of sedges, particularly the cotton grasses. However, our data show no treatment effects on the abundance of either group. We did find an effect of time, with the abundance of both sedges and Sphagnum spp. varying significantly between some years. For the sedges there was no systematic change over time, while for the Sphagnum spp. abundance tended to increase through the study period. This systematic change was not related to a measure of the vigour of the sedges, although vigour was lower towards the end of the study compared to the beginning. Our vegetation data are consistent with our water-table data. As with plant type abundance, we did not find any statistically significant differences in water-table depths between treatments, both for annual averages and summer averages. We comment on why ditch blocking does not seem to have affected water tables and vegetation composition at our study site. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | The UK Government’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) funded the research under grant SP1202 (goo.gl/H45Uuk). We are grateful to The National Trust for giving permission to work at the site, for paying for the experimental blocking and for providing assistance with setting up the experiment. The Countryside Council for Wales (now part of Natural Resources Wales) are also thanked for funding the vegetation survey. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 13 April 2017 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11273-017-9545-z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/27998 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2017
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Blanket peatland | en_GB |
dc.subject | Re-wetting | en_GB |
dc.subject | Vegetation response | en_GB |
dc.subject | Cotton grass (Eriophorum vaginatum) | en_GB |
dc.subject | Sphagnum | en_GB |
dc.subject | Hydrological response | en_GB |
dc.title | An experimental study on the response of blanket bog vegetation and water tables to ditch blocking | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-13T11:46:05Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0923-4861 | |
dc.description | This is the final version of the article. Available from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-9834 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Wetlands Ecology and Management | en_GB |