Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPalphramand, K
dc.contributor.authorDelahay, R
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, A
dc.contributor.authorGowtage, S
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, GA
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, RA
dc.contributor.authorChambers, M
dc.contributor.authorCarter, SP
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-21T09:25:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-06
dc.description.abstractThe control of tuberculosis (TB) in cattle in the UK and Ireland is compromised by transmission of Mycobacterium bovis to cattle from the European badger (Meles meles), which acts as a wildlife reservoir. Vaccination of badgers could potentially contribute to TB control but the only licensed vaccine is injectable BadgerBCG which requires the live-capture of badgers. Current research is aimed at developing an oral TB vaccine (where vaccine is contained within bait) that is intended to be more cost-effective to deploy over large areas. In order to identify a lead product, candidate baits identified from captive badger studies were evaluated in three successive bait screening studies with wild badgers. A fourth field study, using the lead candidate bait and biomarkers, investigated the effectiveness of different carriers for their potential to deliver liquid payloads (vaccine surrogate). In each field study, bait disappearance was monitored daily for ten days and remote video surveillance was used to determine preference (i.e. the order in which baits were taken). In the carrier study, biomarkers were used to determine what proportion of subsequently trapped badgers had ingested the bait and the vaccine-carrier biomarker payload. Across all four studies, 79% (3397/4330) of baits were taken by badgers although the number varied significantly by badger social group and bait type. In all studies, bait disappearance increased over time, with 75-100% of baits being taken by day ten. In the carrier study, 75% (9/12) of trapped badgers tested positive for at least one of the biomarkers and the type of carrier did not influence bait attractiveness. Together with data from complementary laboratory and captive animal studies, this study identified a highly attractive and palatable bait (peanut-based paste bait; PT) and vaccine-carrier (hydrogenated peanut oil; HPO) combination with the potential to deliver a liquid vaccine to wild badgers.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank Pest Tech Ltd. (New Zealand), Connovation Ltd. (NZ), Immune Solutions Ltd. (NZ), Icthus Industries (USA), Zapi Industrie (Italy) and IDT Biologika (Germany) for supplying bait and carrier materials for these studies, and the field team at Woodchester Park. All work involving live badgers was carried out under a UK Home Office licence, in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and was subject to an internal ethical review process. This study was funded by Defra.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 35, No. 34, pp. 4402 - 4407en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.059
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/29454
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policyen_GB
dc.subjectBCGen_GB
dc.subjectBadgeren_GB
dc.subjectBaiten_GB
dc.subjectOral vaccinationen_GB
dc.subjectTuberculosisen_GB
dc.titleField evaluation of candidate baits for oral delivery of BCG vaccine to European badgers, Meles meles.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0264-410X
exeter.place-of-publicationNetherlandsen_GB
dc.descriptionAuthor's accepted versionen_GB
dc.descriptionFinal version available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalVaccineen_GB
dc.identifier.pmid28689652


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record