dc.contributor.author | Pickup, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Atkinson, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Hollnagel, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Bowie, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Gray, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Rawlinson, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Forrester, K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-04T13:08:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09-14 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to investigate why there is variability in taking blood. A multi method Pilot study was completed in four National Health Service Scotland hospitals. Human Factors/Ergonomics principles were applied to analyse data from 50 observations, 15 interviews and 12-months of incident data from all Scottish hospitals. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) was used to understand why variability may influence blood sampling functions. The analysis of the 61 pre blood transfusion sampling incidents highlighted limitations in the data collected to understand factors influencing performance. FRAM highlighted how variability in the sequence of blood sampling functions and the number of practitioners involved in a single blood sampling activity was influenced by the working environment, equipment, clinical context, work demands and staff resources. This pilot study proposes a realistic view of why blood sampling activities vary and proposes the need to consider the system's resilience in future safety management strategies. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study benefited from joint funding from NHS Education for Scotland (NES) and Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service (SNBTS). | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 59 (A), pp. 234 - 242 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.027 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/29679 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27890133 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Blood sampling | en_GB |
dc.subject | Resilience | en_GB |
dc.subject | Wrong blood in tube | en_GB |
dc.subject | Blood Specimen Collection | en_GB |
dc.subject | Blood Transfusion | en_GB |
dc.subject | Hospitals | en_GB |
dc.subject | Human Engineering | en_GB |
dc.subject | Humans | en_GB |
dc.subject | Medical Errors | en_GB |
dc.subject | Patient Identification Systems | en_GB |
dc.subject | Patient Safety | en_GB |
dc.subject | Pilot Projects | en_GB |
dc.subject | Workload | en_GB |
dc.subject | Workplace | en_GB |
dc.title | Blood sampling - Two sides to the story | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-04T13:08:18Z | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Applied Ergonomics | en_GB |