dc.contributor.author | Evans, JP | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Gangannagaripalli, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodwin, V | |
dc.contributor.author | Valderas, JM | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-09T11:22:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-04-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Clinical rating systems are used as outcome
measures in clinical trials and attempt to gauge the patient's views of
their own health. The choice of clinical rating system should be
supported by its performance against established quality standards.
Methods: A search strategy was developed to identify all studies
reporting the use of clinical rating systems in the tennis elbow
literature. The strategy was run from inception in Medline Embase and
CINHAL. Data extraction identified the date of publication, country of
data collection, pathology assessed and outcome measure used.
Results: 980 studies were identified that reported clinical rating system
use. 72 separate rating systems were identified. 41% of studies used two
or more separate measures. Overall 54% of studies used the Mayo Elbow
Performance Score (MEPS). For Arthroplasty 82% used MEPS, 17% used
Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), 7% used quickDASH. For
Trauma 66.7% used MEPS, 32% used DASH, 23% used the Morrey Score. For
Tendinopathy, 31% used DASH, 23% used Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow
Evaluation, 13% used MEPS. Over time there is increased proportional use
of the MEPS, DASH, qDASH, Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE)
and Oxford Elbow Score (OES).
Conclusions: This study has identified the wide choice and usage of
clinical rating systems in the elbow literature. Numerous studies report
measures without a history of either pathology specific or cross-cultural
validation. Interpretability and comparison of outcomes is dependent on
the unification of outcome measure choice. This is not currently
demonstrated. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 27 (4), pp. e98-e106. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.027 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/30864 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 01 April 2019 in compliance with publisher policy. | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved. | |
dc.title | Clinical Rating Systems in Elbow Research - A Systematic Review Exploring Trends and Distributions of Use | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1058-2746 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | en_GB |