Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoddy, K
dc.contributor.authorCowan, K
dc.contributor.authorGibson, A
dc.contributor.authorBritten, N
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-10T08:50:36Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-27
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: This study explored the divergence and convergence between funded research about type 1 diabetes and the research agenda of people living with the condition and their carers. DESIGN, METHOD, SETTING: A secondary analysis was undertaken of existing data from two UK organisations who regularly work with patients and carers to identify research priorities. The research ideas of people with diabetes were identified in two ways: in 15 research question generation workshops involving approximately 100 patients and carers, and in a James Lind Alliance Type 1 Diabetes Priority Setting Partnership with approximately 580 patients, carers and clinicians (clinician question submissions were excluded from analysis). A total of 859 individual research questions were collected from patients and carers. Diabetes research funding activity was identified through extensive online searches which provided a total of 172 relevant research projects for analysis. RESULTS: The data were thematically analysed and areas of priority for research identified and compared between the patient and funded research agendas. The overall finding of this study is that there is substantial convergence between the two research agendas, alongside some important areas of divergence. The key areas of divergence were found in care delivery, injection issues, psychosocial impacts and women's health. We also demonstrate how an apparently convergent priority can host significant differences in emphasis between patient-generated and funded research agendas. CONCLUSIONS: We offer a comparison of a funded research agenda with one that has been derived directly from people with type 1 diabetes without initial framing by researchers. This provided a rare opportunity to explore the viewpoints of the end-users of research and compare them to realised research as determined by researchers and research organisations.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article presents independent research supported by the National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care in the South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC). The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The James Lind Alliance Type 1 Diabetes Priority Setting Partnership was funded by the Insulin Dependent Diabetes Trust charity.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 7 (9), article e016540en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016540
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/30882
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28963289en_GB
dc.rights© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectdiabetes in pregnancyen_GB
dc.subjectdiabetic footen_GB
dc.subjectdiabetic neuropathyen_GB
dc.titleDoes funded research reflect the priorities of people living with type 1 diabetes? A secondary analysis of research questionsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-01-10T08:50:36Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record