Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichards, DA
dc.contributor.authorHilli, A
dc.contributor.authorPentecost, C
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, VA
dc.contributor.authorFrost, J
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-19T11:06:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-12T10:56:30Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-20
dc.description.abstractAIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of nursing interventions for people's nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene needs. BACKGROUND: Patient experience of health care is sensitive to nursing quality. A refocus on fundamental nursing care is undermined by lack of evidence of effectiveness for interventions in core areas such as elimination, nutrition, mobility and hygiene. DESIGN: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW: METHODS: We searched for and included experimental studies on interventions by professionally qualified and unregistered nurses that addressed participants' nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene needs. We extracted data on scope, quality and results of studies followed by descriptive narrative synthesis of included study outcomes using a novel form of harvest plots. RESULTS: We included 149 studies, 35 nutrition, 56 elimination, 16 mobility, 39 hygiene, and three addressing two or more areas simultaneously (67 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 32 non-RCTs and 50 uncontrolled trials). Studies into interventions on participant self-management of nutrition (n=25), oral health (n=26), catheter care (n=23), and self-management of elimination (n=21) were the most prevalent. Most studies focussed their outcomes on observational or physiological measures, with very few collecting patient reported outcomes, such as quality of life, experience or self-reported symptoms. All but 13 studies were of low quality and at significant risk of bias. The majority of studies did not define primary outcomes, included multiple measures of identical concepts, used inappropriate analyses, and did not conform to standard reporting quality criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence for fundamental nursing care interventions is sparse, of poor quality and unfit to provide evidence-based guidance to practising nurses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by a Programme Development Grant from the UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR). RP-DG-1214-10001. David Richards and Victoria Goodwin receive funding support from the UK National Institute for Health Research South West Peninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 20 November 2017en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.14150
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/30926
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29156087en_GB
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_GB
dc.titleFundamental nursing care: a systematic review of the evidence on the effect of nursing care interventions for nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygieneen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-01-12T10:56:30Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Clinical Nursingen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record