Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarnish, M
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, HM
dc.contributor.authorBarnish, J
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-02T11:07:30Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: High-heeled shoes (high heels) are frequently worn by many women and form an important part of female gender identity. Issues of explicit and implicit compulsion to wear high heels have been noted. Previous studies and reviews have provided evidence that high heels are detrimental to health. However, the evidence base remains fragmented and no review has covered both the epidemiological and biomechanical literature. In addition, no review has considered the psychosexual benefits that offer essential context in understanding the public health challenge of high heels. METHODS: We searched seven major bibliographic databases up to November 2016, in addition to supplementary searches. We initially identified all review articles of any design that assessed either the psychosexual benefits or negative musculoskeletal health effects of high heels, the latter looking at both the epidemiological and biomechanical perspectives. We additionally considered additional primary studies on areas that had not been reviewed before or in which a marked lack of evidence had been noted. Data were extracted onto standardised forms. Proportionate second review was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 506 unique records were identified, 27 full-text publications were screened and 20 publications (7 reviews and 13 additional studies) were included in our evidence synthesis. The most up-to-date epidemiological review provides clear evidence of an association between high heel wear and hallux valgus, musculoskeletal pain and first-party injury. The body of biomechanical reviews provides clear evidence of changes indicative of increased risk of these outcomes, as well as osteoarthritis, which is not yet evidenced by epidemiological studies. There were no reviews on psychosexual benefits, but all five identified original studies provided evidence of increased attractiveness and/or an impact on men's behaviour associated with high heel wear. With regard to second-party injury, evidence is limited to one descriptive study and eight case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence synthesis clearly shows that high heels bring psychosexual benefits to women but are detrimental to their health. In light of this dilemma, it is important that women's freedom of choice is respected and that any remaining issues of explicit or implicit compulsion are addressed.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 18, article 37en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-017-4573-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-017-4709-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/31282
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28760147en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2017. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectFreedom of choiceen_GB
dc.subjectHallux valgusen_GB
dc.subjectHigh heelsen_GB
dc.subjectHigh-heeled shoesen_GB
dc.subjectInjuryen_GB
dc.subjectOsteoarthritisen_GB
dc.subjectPainen_GB
dc.subjectPublic healthen_GB
dc.subjectSocial determinants of healthen_GB
dc.titleThe 2016 HIGh Heels: Health effects And psychosexual BenefITS (HIGH HABITS) study: systematic review of reviews and additional primary studies.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-02-02T11:07:30Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from BioMed Central via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionNOTE: Erratum to: BMC Public Health, Vol. 18 Erratum An error occurred during the publication of a number of articles in BMC Public Health. These articles were erroneously published in volume number 18, which is listed with a publication date of 2018. However, these articles were published in final form in the year 2017. The erratum listing the actual publication dates and the correct citation for each affected article is at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4709-6en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Public Healthen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record