Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStreet, SE
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, TH
dc.contributor.authorThornton, A
dc.contributor.authorBrown, GR
dc.contributor.authorLaland, KN
dc.contributor.authorCross, CP
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-02T16:12:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-29
dc.description.abstractWomen appear to copy other women’s preferences for men’s faces. This ‘mate-choice copying’ is often taken as evidence of psychological adaptations for processing social information related to mate choice, for which facial information is assumed to be particularly salient. No experiment, however, has directly investigated whether women preferentially copy each other’s face preferences more than other preferences. Further, because prior experimental studies used artificial social information, the effect of real social information on attractiveness preferences is unknown. We collected attractiveness ratings of pictures of men’s faces, men’s hands, and abstract art given by heterosexual women, before and after they saw genuine social information gathered in real time from their peers. Ratings of faces were influenced by social information, but no more or less than were images of hands and abstract art. Our results suggest that evidence for domain-specific social learning mechanisms in humans is weaker than previously suggested.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch supported in part by an ERC Advanced Grant to K.N.L. (EVOCULTURE, ref: 232823). A.T. was supported by a BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship (BB/H021817/1) and a grant from the ESRC (ES/M006042/1).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 8, article 1715en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-018-19770-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/31295
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_GB
dc.relation.sourceThe dataset used in statistical analyses, all analysis code, and details of images used in the experiment, are available as supplementary material.en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.titleHuman mate-choice copying is domain-general social learningen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-02-02T16:12:16Z
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer Nature via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalScientific Reportsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record