Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEbmeier, SK
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, BJ
dc.contributor.authorAraya, MC
dc.contributor.authorArnold, DWD
dc.contributor.authorBiggs, J
dc.contributor.authorCooper, C
dc.contributor.authorCottrell, E
dc.contributor.authorFurtney, M
dc.contributor.authorHickey, J
dc.contributor.authorJay, J
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, R
dc.contributor.authorParker, AL
dc.contributor.authorPritchard, ME
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, E
dc.contributor.authorVenzke, E
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, JL
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T13:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-06
dc.description.abstractGlobal Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) measurements made over the past decades provide insights into the lateral extent of magmatic domains, and capture volcanic process on scales useful for volcano monitoring. Satellite-based SAR imagery has great potential for monitoring topographic change, the distribution of eruptive products and surface displacements (InSAR) at subaerial volcanoes. However, there are challenges in applying it routinely, as would be required for the reliable operational assessment of hazard. The deformation detectable depends upon satellite repeat time and swath widths, relative to the spatial and temporal scales of volcanological processes. We describe the characteristics of InSAR-measured volcano deformation over the past two decades, highlighting both the technique’s capabilities and its limitations as a monitoring tool. To achieve this, we draw on two global datasets of volcano deformation: the Smithsonian Institution Volcanoes of the World database and the Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics volcano deformation catalogue, as well as compiling some measurement characteristics and interpretations from the primary literature. We find that a higher proportion of InSAR observations capture non-eruptive and non-magmatic processes than those from ground-based instrument networks, and that both transient (< month) and long-duration (> 5 years) deformation episodes are under-represented. However, satellite radar is already used to assess the development of extended periods of unrest and long-lasting eruptions, and improved spatial resolution and coverage have resulted in the detection of previously unrecognised deformation at both ends of the spatial scale (~ 10 to > 1000 km2). ‘Baseline’ records of past InSAR measurements, including ‘null’ results, are fundamental for any future interpretation of interferograms in terms of hazard‚ both by providing information about past deformation at an individual volcano, and for assessing the characteristics of deformation that are likely to be detectable (and undetectable) using InSAR. More than half of all InSAR deformation signals attributed to magmatic processes have sources in the shallow crust (< 5 km depth). While the depth distribution of InSAR-derived deformation sources is affected by measurement limitations, their lateral distribution provides information about the extent of active magmatic domains. Deformation is common (24% of all potentially magmatic events) at loci ≥5 km away from the nearest active volcanic vent. This demonstrates that laterally extensive active magmatic domains are not exceptional, but can comprise the shallowest part of trans-crustal magmatic systems in a range of volcanic settings.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSKE is funded by a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship and a European Space Agency Living Planet fellowship (formerly held at the University of Bristol) co-funded by the NERC-BGS Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (COMET). JB is also funded by COMET and by NERC grant Strengthening Resilience in Volcanic Areas (STREVA, NE/J020052/1). The development of the COMET deformation catalogue was supported by a NERC Impact Acceleration Account from the University of Bristol. J.A.J., M.A.F and M.E.P. were partly supported by NASA grants NNX12AO31G and NNX12AM24G issued through the Science Mission Directorate’s Earth Science Division. J.A.J. was also partly supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Smithsonian Institution Global Volcanism Program. EC is grateful for support from the Deep Carbon Observatory.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 7, article 2en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13617-018-0071-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/31349
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.relation.sourceUnless otherwise stated, the observations discussed in this article are drawn from the Smithsonian Institution Global Volcanism Programs Volcanoes of the World database (volcano.si.edu) and the NERC-BGS Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics Volcano Deformation Database (volcanodeformation.blogs.ilrt.org).en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2018. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_GB
dc.subjectMonitoringen_GB
dc.subjectVolcanoen_GB
dc.subjectInSARen_GB
dc.subjectSatelliteen_GB
dc.subjectDeformationen_GB
dc.subjectDatabaseen_GB
dc.subjectMagmaen_GB
dc.subjectMushen_GB
dc.titleSynthesis of global satellite observations of magmatic and volcanic deformation: implications for volcano monitoring & the lateral extent of magmatic domainsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-02-07T13:10:10Z
dc.identifier.issn2191-5040
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Springer via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Applied Volcanologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record