Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorInglis, GN
dc.contributor.authorNaafs, BDA
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Y
dc.contributor.authorMcClymont, EL
dc.contributor.authorEvershed, RP
dc.contributor.authorPancost, RD
dc.contributor.authorthe T-GRES Peat Database collaborators
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-15T09:26:11Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-09
dc.description.abstractHopanoids are pentacyclic triterpenoids produced by a wide range of bacteria. Within modern settings, hopanoids mostly occur in the biological 17β,21β(H) configuration. However, in some modern peatlands, the C31 hopane is present as the ‘thermally-mature’ 17α,21β(H) stereoisomer. This has traditionally been ascribed to isomerisation at the C-17 position catalysed by the acidic environment. However, recent work has argued that temperature and/or hydrology also exert a control upon hopane isomerisation. Such findings complicate the application of geohopanoids as palaeoenvironmental proxies. However, due to the small number of peats that have been studied, as well as the lack of peatland diversity sampled, the environmental controls regulating geohopanoid isomerisation remain poorly constrained. Here, we undertake a global approach to investigate the occurrence, distribution and diagenesis of geohopanoids within peat, combining previously published and newly generated data (n = 395) from peatlands with a wide temperature (−1 to 27 °C) and pH (3–8) range. Our results indicate that peats are characterised by a wide range of geohopanoids. However, the C31 hopane and C32 hopanoic acid (and occasionally the C32 hopanol) typically dominate. C32 hopanoic acids occur as αβ- and ββ-stereoisomers, with the ββ-isomer typically dominating. In contrast, C31 hopanes occur predominantly as the αβ-stereoisomer. These two observations collectively suggest that isomerisation is not inherited from an original biological precursor (i.e. biohopanoids). Using geohopanoid ββ/(αβ + ββ) indices, we demonstrate that the abundance of αβ-hopanoids is strongly influenced by the acidic environment, and we observe a significant positive correlation between C31 hopane isomerisation and pH (n = 94, r2 = 0.64, p < 0.001). Crucially, there is no correlation between C31 hopane isomerisation and temperature. We therefore conclude that within peats, αβ-hopanoids are acid-catalysed diagenetic products and their occurrence at shallow depths indicates that this isomerisation is rapid. This shows that geohopanoid ββ/(αβ + ββ) indices can be used to reconstruct pH within modern and ancient peat-forming environments. However, we only recommend using ββ/(αβ + ββ) indices to interrogate large amplitude (>1 pH unit) and longer-term (>1 kyr) variation. Overall, our findings demonstrate the potential of geohopanoids to provide unique new insights into understanding depositional environments and interpreting terrestrial organic matter sources in the geological record.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded through the advanced ERC grant ‘The Greenhouse Earth System’ (T-GRES. Project reference: 340923). RDP acknowledges the Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award. YZ thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project reference: 41372033). ELM acknowledges the Philip Leverhulme Prize. We also thank the NERC Life Sciences Mass Spectrometry Facility (Bristol) for analytical support and D. Atkinson for help with the sample preparation. GNI thanks Janet Dehmer and Philippe Schaeffer for helpful discussions. Members of the T-GRES Peat Database collaborators are M.J. Amesbury, H. Biester, R. Bindler, J. Blewett, M.A. Burrows, D. del Castillo Torres, F.M. Chambers, A.D. Cohen, S.J. Feakins, M. Gałka, A. Gallego-Sala, L. Gandois, D.M. Gray, P.G. Hatcher, E.N. Honorio Coronado, P.D.M. Hughes, A. Huguet, M. Könönen, F. Laggoun-Défarge O. Lähteenoja, M. Lamentowicz, R. Marchant, X. Pontevedra-Pombal, C. Ponton, A. Pourmand, A.M. Rizzuti, L. Rochefort, J. Schellekens, F. De Vleeschouwer. Finally, we thank Darci Rush, Phil Meyers and an anonymous reviewer for their comments and thoughtful suggestions which greatly improved this manuscript.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 224, pp. 249 - 261en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gca.2017.12.029
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/31500
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights(c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectBacteriaen_GB
dc.subjectHopanoidsen_GB
dc.subjectPeaten_GB
dc.subjectLigniteen_GB
dc.subjectDiagenesisen_GB
dc.subjectIsomerisationen_GB
dc.titleDistributions of geohopanoids in peat: Implications for the use of hopanoid-based proxies in natural archivesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-02-15T09:26:11Z
dc.identifier.issn0016-7037
pubs.declined2018-02-15T09:15:45.491+0000
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalGeochimica et Cosmochimica Actaen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record