Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLin, YR
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-20T12:54:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-13
dc.description.abstracthe failure of the White movement in Siberia, one of the key theatres of the Russian civil war, has often been attributed to domestic actors and disunity among the Allies. Less attention is devoted to one of the region's closest neighbours, China. By examining the acrimonious negotiations between China and Russia over Amur River shipping, this article argues that the Whites inherited a legacy of imperial conflict which they were ideologically unable to resolve. Their mishandling of China's nationalist aspirations severely undermined their cause, whereas the Reds won Chinese sympathies through concessions. As in other regions, the White movement collided with nationalism on the Russian periphery.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 90 (247), pp. 76 - 100en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-2281.12166
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/31582
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley for Institute of Historical Researchen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 13 January 2019 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2017 Institute of Historical Researchen_GB
dc.titleWhite water, Red tide: Sino-Russian conflict on the Amur 1917-20en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0950-3471
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalHistorical Researchen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record