Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVaidya, A
dc.contributor.authorBorgonovi, E
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RS
dc.contributor.authorSahel, J-A
dc.contributor.authorRizzo, S
dc.contributor.authorStanga, PE
dc.contributor.authorKukreja, A
dc.contributor.authorWalter, P
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-26T09:22:12Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-14
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary genetic disease causing bilateral retinal degeneration. RP is a leading cause of blindness resulting in incurable visual impairment and drastic reduction in the Quality of life of the patients. Second Sight Medical Products Inc. developed Argus II, a retinal prosthesis system for treating RP. Argus II is the world's first ever-commercial implant intended to restore some vision in the blind patients. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Argus® II Retinal Prosthesis System (Argus II) in Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) patients. METHOD: A multi -state transition Markov model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of Argus II versus usual care in RP from the perspective of healthcare payer. A hypothetical cohort of 1000 RP patients aged 46 years followed up over a (lifetime) 25-year time horizon. Health outcomes were expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct healthcare costs expressed in 2012 €. Results are reported as incremental cost per ratios (ICERs) with outcomes and costs discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. RESULTS: The ICER for Argus II was €14,603/QALY. Taking into account the uncertainty in model inputs the ICER was €14,482/QALY in the probabilistic analysis. In the scenarios of an assumption of no reduction on cost across model visual acuity states or a model time horizon as short as 10 years the ICER increased to €31,890/QALY and €49,769/QALY respectively. CONCLUSION: This economic evaluation shows that Argus II is a cost-effective intervention compared to usual care of the RP patients. The lifetime analysis ICER for Argus II falls below the published societal willingness to pay of EuroZone countries.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 14: 49en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2415-14-49
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/31664
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24731533en_GB
dc.rights© 2014 Vaidya et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectHealth Care Costsen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMarkov Chainsen_GB
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_GB
dc.subjectModels, Statisticalen_GB
dc.subjectProstheses and Implantsen_GB
dc.subjectQuality-Adjusted Life Yearsen_GB
dc.subjectRetinitis Pigmentosaen_GB
dc.titleThe cost-effectiveness of the Argus II retinal prosthesis in Retinitis Pigmentosa patientsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-02-26T09:22:12Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-2415
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Ophthalmologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record