Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKuijper, B
dc.contributor.authorJohnstone, RA
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-26T09:24:05Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-24
dc.description.abstractExisting models of parental investment have mainly focused on interactions at the level of the family and have paid much less attention to the impact of population-level processes. Here we extend classical models of parental care to assess the impact of population structure and limited dispersal. We find that sex differences in dispersal substantially affect the amount of care provided by each parent, with the more philopatric sex providing the majority of care to young. This effect is most pronounced in highly viscous populations: in such cases, when classical models would predict stable biparental care, inclusion of a modest sex difference in dispersal leads to uniparental care by the philopatric sex. In addition, mating skew also affects sex differences in parental investment, with the more numerous sex providing most of the care. However, the effect of mating skew holds only when parents care for their own offspring. When individuals breed communally, we recover the previous finding that the more philopatric sex provides most of the care even when it is the rarer sex. We conclude that sex-biased dispersal is likely to be an important yet currently overlooked driver of sex differences in parental care.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBK has been funded by an EPSRC 2020 Science fellowship (grant number EP/I017909/1) and a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Research Fellowship (ECF 2015-273). RAJ has been funded by a EPSRC grant number EP/H031928/1. This work has made use of the Carson computing cluster at the Environment and Sustainability Institute at the University of Exeter. In addition, the authors acknowledge the use of the UCL Legion High Performance Computing Facility (Legion@UCL) and associated support services in the completion of this work. The Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and the Lorentz Centre at the University of Leiden, the Netherlands funded a workshop on nongenetic effects that contributed to this article.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 189 (5), pp. 501 - 514en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/691330
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/31665
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Pressen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 24 March 2018 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2017 by The University of Chicagoen_GB
dc.subjectparental efforten_GB
dc.subjectnegotiationen_GB
dc.subjectkin selectionen_GB
dc.subjectgame theoryen_GB
dc.subjectsex differencesen_GB
dc.subjectkin competitionen_GB
dc.titleHow Sex-Biased Dispersal Affects Sexual Conflict over Careen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0003-0147
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from University of Chicago Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalThe American Naturalisten_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record