Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPontiroli, A
dc.contributor.authorTravis, ER
dc.contributor.authorSweeney, FP
dc.contributor.authorPorter, D
dc.contributor.authorGaze, WH
dc.contributor.authorMason, S
dc.contributor.authorHibberd, V
dc.contributor.authorHolden, J
dc.contributor.authorCourtenay, O
dc.contributor.authorWellington, EMH
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-13T11:09:37Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-23
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Mycobacterium bovis is the aetiological agent of bovine tuberculosis (bTB), an important recrudescent zoonosis, significantly increasing in British herds in recent years. Wildlife reservoirs have been identified for this disease but the mode of transmission to cattle remains unclear. There is evidence that viable M. bovis cells can survive in soil and faeces for over a year. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We report a multi-operator blinded trial for a rigorous comparison of five DNA extraction methods from a variety of soil and faecal samples to assess recovery of M. bovis via real-time PCR detection. The methods included four commercial kits: the QIAamp Stool Mini kit with a pre-treatment step, the FastDNA® Spin kit, the UltraClean™ and PowerSoil™ soil kits and a published manual method based on phenol:chloroform purification, termed Griffiths. M. bovis BCG Pasteur spiked samples were extracted by four operators and evaluated using a specific real-time PCR assay. A novel inhibition control assay was used alongside spectrophotometric ratios to monitor the level of inhibitory compounds affecting PCR, DNA yield, and purity. There were statistically significant differences in M. bovis detection between methods of extraction and types of environmental samples; no significant differences were observed between operators. Processing times and costs were also evaluated. To improve M. bovis detection further, the two best performing methods, FastDNA® Spin kit and Griffiths, were optimised and the ABI TaqMan environmental PCR Master mix was adopted, leading to improved sensitivities. CONCLUSIONS: M. bovis was successfully detected in all environmental samples; DNA extraction using FastDNA® Spin kit was the most sensitive method with highest recoveries from all soil types tested. For troublesome faecal samples, we have used and recommend an improved assay based on a reduced volume, resulting in detection limits of 4.25×10(5) cells g(-1) using Griffiths and 4.25×10(6) cells g(-1) using FastDNA® Spin kit.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBSRCBB/E020925/1 grant to OC and EMHW, and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, DEFRA SE3231 grant to EMHW and OC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 6, e17916en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0017916
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32076
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21448453en_GB
dc.rightsCopyright: 2011 Pontiroli et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.subjectAnimalsen_GB
dc.subjectArtifactsen_GB
dc.subjectCattleen_GB
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_GB
dc.subjectDNA, Bacterialen_GB
dc.subjectMycobacterium bovisen_GB
dc.subjectPolymerase Chain Reactionen_GB
dc.subjectReagent Kits, Diagnosticen_GB
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen_GB
dc.titlePathogen quantitation in complex matrices: a multi-operator comparison of DNA extraction methods with a novel assessment of PCR inhibitionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-03-13T11:09:37Z
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited Statesen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Oneen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record