Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMullineaux, PM
dc.contributor.authorExposito-Rodriguez, M
dc.contributor.authorLaissue, PP
dc.contributor.authorSmirnoff, N
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-15T12:03:39Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-02
dc.description.abstractLike all aerobic organisms, plants and algae co-opt reactive oxygen species (ROS) as signalling molecules to drive cellular responses to changes in their environment. In this respect, there is considerable commonality between all eukaryotes imposed by the constraints of ROS chemistry, similar metabolism in many subcellular compartments, the requirement for a high degree of signal specificity and the deployment of thiol peroxidases as transducers of oxidising equivalents to regulatory proteins. Nevertheless, plants and algae carry out specialised signalling arising from oxygenic photosynthesis in chloroplasts and photoautotropism, which often induce an imbalance between absorption of light energy and the capacity to use it productively. A key means of responding to this imbalance is through communication of chloroplasts with the nucleus to adjust cellular metabolism. Two ROS, singlet oxygen (1O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), initiate distinct signalling pathways when photosynthesis is perturbed.1O2, because of its potent reactivity means that it initiates but does not transduce signalling. In contrast, the lower reactivity of H2O2means that it can also be a mobile messenger in a spatially-defined signalling pathway. How plants translate a H2O2message to bring about changes in gene expression is unknown and therefore, we draw on information from other eukaryotes to propose a working hypothesis. The role of these ROS generated in other subcellular compartments of plant cells in response to HL is critically considered alongside other eukaryotes. Finally, the responses of animal cells to oxidative stress upon high irradiance exposure is considered for new comparisons between plant and animal cells.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant nos. BB/I020071/1 and BB/P026656/ 1 to PMM and NS.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationDOI:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.033en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.033
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32123
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29410363en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 2nd February 2019 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2018 Published by Elsevier Incen_GB
dc.subjectAnimal cellsen_GB
dc.subjectChloroplast-to-nucleus communicationen_GB
dc.subjectHigh lighten_GB
dc.subjectHydrogen peroxideen_GB
dc.subjectMicrodomainsen_GB
dc.subjectMitochondriaen_GB
dc.subjectPeroxisomesen_GB
dc.subjectPhotosynthesisen_GB
dc.subjectPlant cellsen_GB
dc.subjectROS-mediated signallingen_GB
dc.subjectRedox relayen_GB
dc.subjectRetrograde signallingen_GB
dc.subjectSinglet oxygenen_GB
dc.subjectThiol peroxidasesen_GB
dc.subjectYeasten_GB
dc.titleROS-dependent signalling pathways in plants and algae exposed to high light: Comparisons with other eukaryotesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0891-5849
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited Statesen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalFree Radical Biology and Medicineen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record