Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTikhonova, IA
dc.contributor.authorHuxley, N
dc.contributor.authorSnowsill, T
dc.contributor.authorCrathorne, L
dc.contributor.authorVarley-Campbell, J
dc.contributor.authorNapier, M
dc.contributor.authorHoyle, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-09T09:37:45Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Combination therapies with cetuximab (Erbitux®; Merck Serono UK Ltd) and panitumumab (Vectibix®; Amgen UK Ltd) are shown to be less effective in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer who have mutations in exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS oncogenes from the rat sarcoma (RAS) family. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of these drugs in patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type (i.e. non-mutated) metastatic colorectal cancer, not eligible for liver resection at baseline, from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. METHODS: We constructed a partitioned survival model to evaluate the long-term costs and benefits of cetuximab and panitumumab combined with either FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) vs. FOLFOX or FOLFIRI alone. The economic analysis was based on three randomised controlled trials. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were discounted at 3.5% per annum. RESULTS: Based on the evidence available, both drugs fulfil the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's end-of-life criteria. In the analysis, assuming discount prices for the drugs from patient access schemes agreed by the drug manufacturers with the Department of Health, predicted mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for cetuximab + FOLFOX, panitumumab + FOLFOX and cetuximab + FOLFIRI compared with chemotherapy alone appeared cost-effective at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's threshold of £50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, applicable to end-of-life treatments. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab and panitumumab were recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, not eligible for liver resection at baseline, for use within the National Health Service in England. Both treatments are available via the UK Cancer Drugs Fund.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationFirst Online: 01 March 2018en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40273-018-0630-9
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s40273-018-0630-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32369
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29498000en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 2 March 2019 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018en_GB
dc.titleEconomic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1170-7690
exeter.place-of-publicationNew Zealanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPharmacoeconomicsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record