Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSainsbury, KA
dc.contributor.authorShore, RF
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, H
dc.contributor.authorCroose, E
dc.contributor.authorPereira, MG
dc.contributor.authorSleep, D
dc.contributor.authorKitchener, AC
dc.contributor.authorHantke, G
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, RA
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-25T14:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-07
dc.description.abstractAs a result of legal protection and population recovery, European polecats (Mustela putorius) in Great Britain are expanding into areas associated with greater usage of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs). We analysed polecat livers collected from road casualties from 2013 to 2016 for residues of five SGARs. We related variation in residues to polecat traits and potential exposure pathways, by analysing stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) in their whiskers. 54 of 68 (79%) polecats had detectable residues of at least one SGAR. Bromadiolone (71%) was the most frequently detected compound, followed by difenacoum (53%) and brodifacoum (35%). Applying historical limits of detection to allow comparison between these new data and previous assessments, we show that in the 25 years from 1992 to 2016 inclusive, the rate of detection of SGARs in polecats in Britain has increased by a factor of 1.7. The probability of SGAR detection was positively related to increasing values of δ15N, suggesting that polecats feeding at a higher trophic level were more likely to be exposed. Total concentrations of SGARs in polecats with detectable residues were higher in polecats collected in arable compared to pastoral habitats, and in the west compared to the east of Britain. The number of compounds detected and total concentrations of SGARs increased with polecat age. There was no evidence of regional or seasonal variation in the probability of detecting SGARs, suggesting that the current risk of exposure to SGARs does not vary seasonally and has increased (from that in the 1990s) throughout the polecat's range. We recommend quantification of current practices in rodenticide usage, particularly in the light of recent regulatory changes, to enable assessment and mitigation of the risks of secondary exposure to rodenticides in non-target wildlife.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding and support for the rodenticides analysis was provided by the People’s Trust for Endangered Species and the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. ACK is grateful to the Negaunee Foundation for its continuing generous support of a preparator at National Museums Scotland. KS is funded by The Vincent Wildlife Trust and the University of Exeter.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 236, pp. 689 - 698.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32608
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29438955en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 07 March 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_GB
dc.subjectBrodifacoumen_GB
dc.subjectBromadioloneen_GB
dc.subjectDifenacoumen_GB
dc.subjectPolecaten_GB
dc.subjectRodenticidesen_GB
dc.subjectSecondary exposureen_GB
dc.titleLong-term increase in secondary exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides in European polecats Mustela putorius in Great Britain.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0269-7491
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnvironmental Pollutionen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record