Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAbbott, RA
dc.contributor.authorMartin, AE
dc.contributor.authorNewlove-Delgado, TV
dc.contributor.authorBethel, A
dc.contributor.authorWhear, RS
dc.contributor.authorCoon, JT
dc.contributor.authorLogan, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-01T11:09:59Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-21
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Between 4% and 25% of school-aged children complain of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) severe enough to interfere with their daily activities. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in eleven databases and 2 trials registries from inception to June 2016. An update search was run in November 2017. All screening was performed by 2 independent reviewers. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the evidence assessed using GRADE. We included any dietary, pharmacological or psychosocial intervention for RAP, defined by Apley or an abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorder, as defined by the Rome III criteria, in children and adolescents. RESULTS: We included 55 RCTs, involving 3572 children with RAP (21 dietary, 15 pharmacological, 19 psychosocial, and 1 multiarm). We found probiotic diets, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and hypnotherapy were reported to reduce pain in the short-term and there is some evidence of medium term effectiveness. There was insufficient evidence of effectiveness for all other dietary interventions and psychosocial therapies. There was no robust evidence of effectiveness for pharmacological interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall the evidence base for treatment decisions is poor. These data suggest that probiotics, CBT, and hypnotherapy could be considered as part of holistic management of children with RAP. The evidence regarding relative effectiveness of different strains of probiotics is currently insufficient to guide clinical practice. The lack of evidence of effectiveness for any drug suggests that there is little justification for their use outside of well-conducted clinical trials. There is an urgent need for high-quality RCTs to provide evidence to guide management of this common condition.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for the South West Peninsula. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health in England.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MPG.0000000000001922
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32662
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology.en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29470291en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 21 February 2019 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2018 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology.en_GB
dc.subjectrecurrent abdominal painen_GB
dc.subjectRAPen_GB
dc.subjectfunctional abdominal painen_GB
dc.subjectFAPen_GB
dc.subjectchronic painen_GB
dc.subjectchildrenen_GB
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_GB
dc.titleRecurrent Abdominal Pain in Children: Summary Evidence From 3 Systematic Reviews of Treatment Effectiveness.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited Statesen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutritionen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record