Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichards, SH
dc.contributor.authorDickens, C
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, R
dc.contributor.authorRichards, DA
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RS
dc.contributor.authorUkoumunne, OC
dc.contributor.authorTurner, KM
dc.contributor.authorGandhi, M
dc.contributor.authorKuyken, W
dc.contributor.authorGibson, A
dc.contributor.authorDavey, A
dc.contributor.authorWarren, F
dc.contributor.authorWinder, R
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, J
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-01T12:37:50Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-02
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Around 17% of people attending UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes have depression. Optimising psychological wellbeing is a rehabilitation goal, but provision of psychological care is limited. We developed and piloted an Enhanced Psychological Care (EPC) intervention embedded within cardiac rehabilitation, aiming to test key areas of uncertainty to inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) and economic evaluation. METHODS: An external pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) randomised eight cardiac rehabilitation teams (clusters) to either usual care of cardiac rehabilitation provision (UC), or EPC in addition to UC. EPC comprised mental health care coordination and patient-led behavioural activation with nurse support. Adults eligible for cardiac rehabilitation following an acute coronary syndrome and identified with new-onset depressive symptoms during an initial nurse assessment were eligible. Measures were performed at baseline and 5- and 8-month follow-ups and compared between EPC and UC. Team and participant recruitment and retention rates, and participant outcomes (clinical events, depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life, patient experiences, and resource use) were assessed. RESULTS: Eight out of twenty teams were recruited and randomised. Of 614 patients screened, 55 were eligible and 29 took part (5%, 95% CI 3 to 7% of those screened), with 15 patient participants cluster randomised to EPC and 14 to UC. Nurse records revealed that 8/15 participants received the maximum number of EPC sessions offered; and 4/15 received no sessions. Seven out of fifteen EPC participants were referred to another NHS psychological service compared to none in UC. We followed up 27/29 participants at 5 months and 17/21 at 8 months. The mean difference (EPC minus UC) in depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory) at follow-up (adjusting for baseline score) was 1.7 (95% CI - 3.8 to 7.3; N = 26) at 5 months and 4.4 (95% CI - 1.4 to 10.2; N = 17) at 8 months. DISCUSSION: While valued by patients and nurses, organisational and workload constraints are significant barriers to EPC implementation. There remains a need to develop and test new models of psychological care within cardiac rehabilitation. Our study offers important data to inform the design of future trials of similar interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN34701576 . Registered on 29 May 2014. Funding details: UK NIHR HTA Programme (project 12/189/09).en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was funded by the UK NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number 12/189/06). The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust is acting as trial sponsor. The Funding Agency and trial sponsors have not been substantively involved in the design, or data acquisition for this research, nor the drafting of this manuscript; the views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Health Technology Assessment Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. Rob Anderson, John Campbell, Christopher Dickens, David Richards, Suzanne Richards, Rod Taylor, Obioha Ukoumunne and Fiona Warren were centrally funded by the University of Exeter Medical School. Suzanne Richards was also centrally funded by the University of Leeds during the drafting of this manuscript. Katrina Turner is funded by the University of Bristol, Andrew Gibson by the University of the West of England and Willem Kuyken by Oxford University. Katrina Turner is also supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (CLAHRC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust. Manish Gandhi is funded by the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. Antoinette Davey and Rachel Winder were employed by the University of Exeter Medical School on the above funding award. David Richards, Rod Taylor and Obioha Ukoumunne are also supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation, Vol. 19, pp. 211 - ?en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-018-2576-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32664
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.sourceThe study is stored in a secure repository at the University of Exeter Medical School. Although not publically available, requests to access the dataset will be considered, and sent to the chief investigator, Professor John Campbell.en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29609644en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2018. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectBehavioural activationen_GB
dc.subjectCardiac rehabilitationen_GB
dc.subjectCoronary heart diseaseen_GB
dc.subjectDepressionen_GB
dc.subjectMental health care coordinationen_GB
dc.subjectMultimorbidityen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative interviewsen_GB
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trialen_GB
dc.titleAssessing the effectiveness of Enhanced Psychological Care for patients with depressive symptoms attending cardiac rehabilitation compared with treatment as usual (CADENCE): a pilot cluster randomised controlled trialen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-05-01T12:37:50Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from BioMed Central via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalTrialsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record