dc.contributor.author | Boyd, F | |
dc.contributor.author | White, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Bell, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Burt, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-02T09:35:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-03-30 | |
dc.description.abstract | Contact with natural environments may be beneficial for various health and social outcomes but is often lower among groups who could benefit the most. Using data from >60,000 adults in England, we explored the spatial (e.g. amount of local greenspace), individual (e.g. socio-economic status) and temporal (e.g. seasonality) predictors of infrequent contact and the reasons given for it. Replicating earlier, smaller studies, infrequent users were more likely to be; female, older, in poor health, of lower socioeconomic status, of ethnic minority status, live in relatively deprived areas with less neighbourhood greenspace and be further from the coast. Extending previous findings, we also identified regional, seasonal and annual effects. Although response on issues of time availability were important, being ‘not interested’ and ‘no particular reason’ were also common. Identifying the predictors of these justifications (e.g. area deprivation was predictive of ‘not interested’, but individual socioeconomic status was predictive of ‘no particular reason’) sheds light on which demographic groups to engage in specific interventions designed to inspire greater interest in, and contact with, the natural world to offer more inclusive opportunities for positive experiences in nature. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This paper is based on an MSc project conducted by the first author and supervised by the second author. It was supported by funding from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Environmental Change and Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine – UK in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) – UK, and in collaboration with the University of Exeter – UK, University College London – UK, and the Met Office – UK. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 175,, pp. 102 - 113 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.016 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/32681 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 30 September 2019 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2018. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | Infrequent users | en_GB |
dc.subject | Natural environment | en_GB |
dc.subject | Barriers | en_GB |
dc.subject | Engagement | en_GB |
dc.title | Who doesn’t visit natural environments for recreation and why: A population representative analysis of spatial, individual and temporal factors among adults in England | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Landscape and Urban Planning | en_GB |