Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyd, F
dc.contributor.authorWhite, M
dc.contributor.authorBell, S
dc.contributor.authorBurt, J
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-02T09:35:45Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-30
dc.description.abstractContact with natural environments may be beneficial for various health and social outcomes but is often lower among groups who could benefit the most. Using data from >60,000 adults in England, we explored the spatial (e.g. amount of local greenspace), individual (e.g. socio-economic status) and temporal (e.g. seasonality) predictors of infrequent contact and the reasons given for it. Replicating earlier, smaller studies, infrequent users were more likely to be; female, older, in poor health, of lower socioeconomic status, of ethnic minority status, live in relatively deprived areas with less neighbourhood greenspace and be further from the coast. Extending previous findings, we also identified regional, seasonal and annual effects. Although response on issues of time availability were important, being ‘not interested’ and ‘no particular reason’ were also common. Identifying the predictors of these justifications (e.g. area deprivation was predictive of ‘not interested’, but individual socioeconomic status was predictive of ‘no particular reason’) sheds light on which demographic groups to engage in specific interventions designed to inspire greater interest in, and contact with, the natural world to offer more inclusive opportunities for positive experiences in nature.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper is based on an MSc project conducted by the first author and supervised by the second author. It was supported by funding from the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Environmental Change and Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine – UK in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) – UK, and in collaboration with the University of Exeter – UK, University College London – UK, and the Met Office – UK.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 175,, pp. 102 - 113en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32681
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 30 September 2019 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2018. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectInfrequent usersen_GB
dc.subjectNatural environmenten_GB
dc.subjectBarriersen_GB
dc.subjectEngagementen_GB
dc.titleWho doesn’t visit natural environments for recreation and why: A population representative analysis of spatial, individual and temporal factors among adults in Englanden_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalLandscape and Urban Planningen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record