Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGustavsson, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-04T09:02:29Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-26
dc.description.abstractResearch has suggested there is a need for an increased attention to the socio-cultural lifeworlds of fishers and fisheries and its importance for fisheries management. An emerging response to this call has been to examine the social and cultural contexts of ‘good fishing’ – an idea which, drawing on the work of Pierre Bourdieu, has sought to move the discussion beyond simply the economic aspects of fishing to also understand the importance of other forms of capital. Utilising these concepts together with the conceptual idea of ‘knowledge cultures’, the following paper examines the ‘cultural sustainability’ of different ways of governing fishing practices – in particular Marine Conservation Zones and voluntary lobster v-notching using a case study approach to the small-scale fishery of Llŷn peninsula, North Wales (UK). The paper observes that those approaches that allow fishers to demonstrate skills and recognises the temporal contingency of fishing lives can be considered more culturally sustainable than others. This paper also notes that culturally acceptable changes to fishing practices can be supported by fishing regulations and, the paper suggests, such innovations are more likely to be taken up by fishers in their everyday fishing practices. The paper recommends that policies seeking to alter fishing practices consider: i) the importance fishers’ hold in demonstrating their skills; ii) how social relations are as important as economic aspects to fishers’ long-term uptake of new practices; and iii) how the past and the future (such as if a successor is present) holds significance for fishers’ actions in the present.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipI would like to thank all fishers and fishing family members who generously volunteered their time to participate in this research. I would also like to express my thanks to the two anonymous reviewers and the editors of this Special Issue whose comments were very helpful in improving the paper. The School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool funded this research.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 97, pp. 262-269en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32719
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 26 March 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2018. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectgood fisheren_GB
dc.subjectknowledge culturesen_GB
dc.subjectsymbolic capitalen_GB
dc.subjectcultural sustainabilityen_GB
dc.subjectmarine Conservation Zonesen_GB
dc.subjectLobster v-notchingen_GB
dc.titleExamining the ‘cultural sustainability’ of two different ways of governing fishing practicesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0308-597X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalMarine Policyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record