Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaglio, D
dc.contributor.authorSherley, R
dc.contributor.authorCook, T
dc.contributor.authorRyan, P
dc.contributor.authorFlower, T
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-09T08:56:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-18
dc.description.abstractMixed-species assemblages are common in nature, providing mutual benefits to associating species including anti-predator advantages or resource facilitation. However, associating with other species may also impose costs through kleptoparasitism (food theft). Identification of these costs, and how they vary when different species breed alongside one another, is essential to understand the payoffs of mixed-species assemblages. We explore the costs of kleptoparasitism for greater crested terns Thalasseus bergii provisioning offspring at a single-species colony, where individuals suffer kleptoparasitism from conspecifics, and at a mixed colony where terns breed alongside Hartlaub’s gulls Chroicocephalus hartlaubii and are vulnerable to both intra and interspecific kleptoparasitism. Gull presence likely contributes to increases in both kleptoparasitic attacks and the proportion of prey lost or stolen during provisioning, relative to the single-species colony. Provisioning adults suffered additional energetic costs in response to gull kleptoparasitism, requiring more attempts to deliver prey, taking longer to do so, and swallowing more prey (to the detriment of their offspring). Gulls also appear to increase the duration of tern vulnerability to kleptoparasitism, because they continued to steal food from adults and chicks after precocial chicks left the nest, when intraspecific kleptoparasitism is negligible. Terns breeding in a mixed colony, therefore, suffer direct and indirect costs through decreased provisioning and increased provisioning effort, which may ultimately affect reproductive success, resulting in colony decline where kleptoparasitism is frequent. This study illustrates how forming a mixed-species seabird breeding assemblage has costs as well as benefits, potentially fluctuating between a parasitic and a mutualistic relationship.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by a Department of Science and TechnologyCentre of Excellence grant to the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology. R.B.S.  was supported by a fellowship from the Leiden Conservation Foundation. This research was approved by SANParks (CONM1182), the Department of Environmental Affairs (RES2013/24, RES2014/83, and RES2015/65) and the animal ethics committee of the University of Cape Town (2013/V3/TC).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 18 April 2018en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/beheco/ary050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32769
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.sourceAnalyses reported in this article can be reproduced using the data provided by Gaglio et al. (2018).en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 19 April 2019 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectkleptoparasitismen_GB
dc.subjectgreater crested ternsen_GB
dc.subjectmixed assemblageen_GB
dc.subjectHartlaub’s gullen_GB
dc.subjectenergy costen_GB
dc.subjectnon-invasiveen_GB
dc.subjectRobben Islanden_GB
dc.titleThe costs of kleptoparasitism: a study of mixed-species seabird breeding coloniesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1045-2249
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from OUP via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBehavioral Ecologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record