Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreen, SM
dc.contributor.authorBaird, AJ
dc.contributor.authorEvans, CD
dc.contributor.authorPeacock, M
dc.contributor.authorHolden, J
dc.contributor.authorChapman, PJ
dc.contributor.authorSmart, RP
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-11T15:24:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-18
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: There is growing interest in how the rewetting of drained peatlands can restart their carbon (C) sink function. However, there are few studies on the effect of ditch blocking on the within-ditch C balance. For a UK blanket bog we assessed how methane (CH 4 ) emissions, net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) balance expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents (CO 2 -e) responded to ditch blocking. Methods: We conducted a fully replicated field trial on a blanket bog in the Upper Conwy catchment, North Wales, UK. Twelve parallel ditches, that ran approximately downslope, were investigated. Four were left open, four had peat dams installed at intervals of a few metres along their length, and four were partially infilled with peat (reprofiled) and dammed. For a period of four years after blocking, we measured peatland-atmosphere fluxes of CH 4 and CO 2 within the ditches. Results: CH 4 fluxes, NEE and overall GHG balance (expressed in terms of CO 2 -e) in the experimental area showed no evidence of varying systematically between the different types of ditch treatment (open, dammed, and reprofiled). In addition, there was little evidence that CH 4 fluxes or CO 2 -e balance changed systematically with time since blocking. Conclusions: We found no evidence of consistent differences between blocking treatments in terms of CH 4 emissions or overall CO 2 -e balance. There was high spatial and temporal variability in CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes within each treatment. We did not observe a post-blocking ‘spike’ in CH 4 fluxes.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe UK Government’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) funded the research under grant SP1202. The Knowledge Economy Skills Scholarship programme is also acknowledged for Michael Peacock’s PhD funding.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 424 (1-2), pp. 619 - 638en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11104-017-3543-z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32806
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag for Royal Netherlands Society of Agricultural Scienceen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_GB
dc.subjectMethaneen_GB
dc.subjectNet ecosystem exchangeen_GB
dc.subjectGHG balanceen_GB
dc.subjectDitch blockingen_GB
dc.subjectBlanket bog (peatland)en_GB
dc.titleMethane and carbon dioxide fluxes from open and blocked ditches in a blanket bogen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-05-11T15:24:58Z
dc.identifier.issn0032-079X
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPlant and Soilen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record