Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobertson, A
dc.contributor.authorDelahay, RJ
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, RA
dc.contributor.authorAylett, P
dc.contributor.authorHenderson, R
dc.contributor.authorGowtage, S
dc.contributor.authorChambers, MA
dc.contributor.authorCarter, SP
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-21T10:27:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-01
dc.description.abstractIn the UK and the Republic of Ireland, the European badger (Meles meles) is a maintenance host for Mycobacterium bovis, and may transmit the infection to cattle causing bovine tuberculosis (TB). Vaccination of badgers using an injectable Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine is undertaken in some areas of the UK with the intention of interrupting this transmission, and vaccination research is underway in Ireland. An oral badger TB vaccine is also under development. We investigated the behaviour of badgers and non-target wildlife species towards three candidate baits being considered for delivering BCG to badgers orally. Bait preference was investigated by recording removal rates of baits and through the use of video surveillance at 16 badger setts. We found high variation in rates of bait removal by badgers among setts but no significant differences in removal rates among bait types or in preference behaviour from video footage. Variation in bait removal among setts correlated with the number of nights on which badgers were seen at the sett, with most baits being removed where badgers were seen on >50% of nights during the ten-day study period. Relatively few baits were removed at setts with low levels of recorded badger activity. Monitoring badger activity prior to bait deployment may therefore be useful in increasing bait uptake and vaccine coverage. Bait removal by badgers increased over the ten-day study period, suggesting initial neophobic behaviour at some setts and that a period of 'pre-feeding' may be required prior to vaccine deployment. Our results indicate that all three candidate baits are attractive to badgers. Removal of baits by non-target wildlife species was generally low, but varied among bait types, with smaller baits in packaging less likely to be removed. Enclosing baits in packaging is likely to deter non-target species, although in some cases non-target species did remove up to 13% of packaged baits.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 135, pp. 95 - 101en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32943
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27931935en_GB
dc.rights© 2016. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectBCGen_GB
dc.subjectBadgeren_GB
dc.subjectBovine tuberculosisen_GB
dc.subjectOral vaccinationen_GB
dc.subjectAnimalsen_GB
dc.subjectAnimals, Wilden_GB
dc.subjectBCG Vaccineen_GB
dc.subjectCattleen_GB
dc.subjectDrug Packagingen_GB
dc.subjectEnglanden_GB
dc.subjectFood Preferencesen_GB
dc.subjectMustelidaeen_GB
dc.subjectMycobacterium bovisen_GB
dc.subjectTuberculosis, Bovineen_GB
dc.subjectVaccinationen_GB
dc.titleBehaviour of European badgers and non-target species towards candidate baits for oral delivery of a tuberculosis vaccineen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-05-21T10:27:59Z
dc.identifier.issn0167-5877
exeter.place-of-publicationNetherlandsen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalPreventive Veterinary Medicineen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record