Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuller, HJ
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-29T11:51:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-10
dc.description.abstractCurated by Astrid Schrader and Elizabeth Johnson: Henry Buller contribution seems to challenge the ethical grounds of Haraway’s important distinction between killing and making killable. What’s left of life when you are born killable? In the case of farm animals, produced for consumption, it is no longer clear “whether their killing [is] an act of ending or of beginning,” like the immortal jellyfish, livestock does not seem to be allowed to die. Their liminal existence reminds us of the ethical importance of letting live responsibly.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 3 (2), pp. 11-12.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32998
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCatalysten_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://catalystjournal.org/index.php/catalyst/article/view/28849en_GB
dc.rights© 2017 Astrid Schrader, Elizabeth R. Johnson, Henry Buller, Deborah Robinson, Simon Rundle, Dorion Sagan, Susanne Schmitt, John Spicer | Licensed to the Catalyst Project under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license.en_GB
dc.title.alternativeConsidering Killability: Experiments in Unsettling Life and Death.en_GB
dc.titleExuent: or, when killability defines a lifeen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-05-29T11:51:44Z
dc.identifier.issn2380-3312
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. This manuscript forms part of 'Schrader, A. and Johnson, E. (Eds) (2017). Considering Killability: Experiments in Unsettling Life and Death. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience , 3( 2) 1-15.' This article can be accessed via the link in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalCatalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscienceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record