Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRicci-Cabello, I
dc.contributor.authorReeves, D
dc.contributor.authorBell, BG
dc.contributor.authorValderas, JM
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-30T09:53:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-07
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To identify patient and family practice characteristics associated with patient-reported experiences of safety problems and harm. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study combining data from the individual postal administration of the validated Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire to a random sample of patients in family practices (response rate=18.4%) and practice-level data for those practices obtained from NHS Digital. We built linear multilevel multivariate regression models to model the association between patient-level (clinical and sociodemographic) and practice-level (size and case-mix, human resources, indicators of quality and safety of care, and practice safety activation) characteristics, and outcome measures. SETTING: Practices distributed across five regions in the North, Centre and South of England. PARTICIPANTS: 1190 patients registered in 45 practices purposefully sampled (maximal variation in practice size and levels of deprivation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported safety problems, harm and overall perception of safety. RESULTS: Higher self-reported levels of safety problems were associated with younger age of patients (beta coefficient 0.15) and lower levels of practice safety activation (0.44). Higher self-reported levels of harm were associated with younger age (0.13) and worse self-reported health status (0.23). Lower self-reported healthcare safety was associated with lower levels of practice safety activation (0.40). The fully adjusted models explained 4.5% of the variance in experiences of safety problems, 8.6% of the variance in harm and 4.4% of the variance in perceptions of patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: Practices' safety activation levels and patients' age and health status are associated with patient-reported safety outcomes in English family practices. The development of interventions aimed at improving patient safety outcomes would benefit from focusing on the identified groups.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research is part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research (NIHR SPCR). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 26 (11), pp. 899-907.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006411
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/33006
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.sourcePREOS-PC data are available under request to the study guarantor.en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28784842en_GB
dc.rights© Article author(s) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.en_GB
dc.titleIdentifying patient and practice characteristics associated with patient-reported experiences of safety problems and harm: a cross-sectional study using a multilevel modelling approach.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-05-30T09:53:22Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-5415
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Quality and Safetyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record