Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrant, HD
dc.contributor.authorAtherton, H
dc.contributor.authorBikker, A
dc.contributor.authorPorqueddu, T
dc.contributor.authorSalisbury, C
dc.contributor.authorMcKinstry, B
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, J
dc.contributor.authorGibson, A
dc.contributor.authorZiebland, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-19T07:57:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The receptionist is pivotal to the smooth running of general practice in the UK, communicating with patients and booking appointments. AIM: The authors aimed to explore the role of the receptionist in the implementation of new approaches to consultations in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: The authors conducted a team-based focused ethnography. Three researchers observed eight general practices across England and Scotland between June 2015 and May 2016. METHOD: Interviews were conducted with 39 patients and 45 staff in the practices, all of which had adopted one or more methods (telephone, email, e-consultation, or internet video) for providing an alternative to face-to-face consultation. RESULTS: Receptionists have a key role in facilitating patient awareness regarding new approaches to consultations in primary care, while at the same time ensuring that patients receive a consultation appropriate to their needs. In this study, receptionists' involvement in implementation and planning for the introduction of alternative approaches to face-to-face consultations was minimal, despite the expectation that they would be involved in delivery. CONCLUSION: A shared understanding within practices of the potential difficulties and extra work that might ensue for reception staff was lacking. This might contribute to the low uptake by patients of potentially important innovations in service delivery. Involvement of the wider practice team in planning and piloting changes, supporting team members through service reconfiguration, and providing an opportunity to discuss and contribute to modifications of any new system would ensure that reception staff are suitably prepared to support the introduction of a new approach to consultations.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (Health Services and Delivery Research [HS&DR] programme) (project number 13/59/08) and hosted by Bristol NHS Clinical Commissioning Group.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 68, 672, pp. e478 - e486en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp18X697505
dc.identifier.otherbjgp18X697505
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/33491
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29866710en_GB
dc.rights© British Journal of General Practice 2018. This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectcommunicationen_GB
dc.subjectfamily practiceen_GB
dc.subjectfocused ethnographyen_GB
dc.subjectgeneral practiceen_GB
dc.subjectmedical receptionistsen_GB
dc.subjectprimary careen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectremote consultationen_GB
dc.titleReceptionists' role in new approaches to consultations in primary care: a focused ethnographic study.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-07-19T07:57:49Z
dc.identifier.issn0960-1643
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of General Practiceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record