Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBennie, J
dc.contributor.authorDavies, TW
dc.contributor.authorCruse, D
dc.contributor.authorInger, R
dc.contributor.authorGaston, K
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-25T13:47:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-12
dc.description.abstract1. Globally, many ecosystems are exposed to artificial light at night. Nighttime lighting has direct biological impacts on species at all trophic levels. However, the effects of artificial light on biotic interactions remain, for the most part, to be determined. 2. We exposed experimental mesocosms containing combinations of grassland plants and invertebrate herbivores and predators to illumination at night over a three-year period to simulate conditions under different common forms of street lighting. 3. We demonstrate both top-down (predation controlled) and bottom-up (resource controlled) impacts of artificial light at night in grassland communities. The impacts on invertebrate herbivore abundance were wavelength dependent and mediated via other trophic levels. 4. White LED lighting decreased the abundance of a generalist herbivore mollusc by 55% in the presence of a visual predator, but not in its absence, while monochromatic amber light (with a peak wavelength similar to low pressure sodium lighting) decreased abundance of a specialist herbivore aphid (by 17%) by reducing the cover and flower abundance of its main food plant in the system. Artificial white light also significantly increased the food plant’s foliar carbon to nitrogen ratio. 5. We conclude that exposure to artificial light at night can trigger ecological effects spanning trophic levels, and that the nature of such impacts depends on the wavelengths emitted by the lighting technology employed. 6. Policy implications. Our results confirm that artificial light at night, at illuminance levels similar to roadside vegetation, can have population effects mediated by both top-down and bottom-up effects on ecosystems. Given the increasing ubiquity of light pollution at night, these impacts may be widespread in the environment. These results underline the importance of minimising ecosystem disruption by reducing light pollution in natural and semi-natural ecosystems.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research leading to this paper was funded by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 268504 to KJG.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 12-July-2018en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2664.13240
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/33538
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.sourceData available via the Dryad Digital Repository doi:10.5061/dryad.8217n76 (Bennie et al., 2018).en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 12 July 2019 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rightsThis article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.en_GB
dc.subjectLight pollutionen_GB
dc.subjectPhotopollutionen_GB
dc.subjectGrasslandsen_GB
dc.subjectTrophic levelsen_GB
dc.subjectAphidsen_GB
dc.subjectMolluscsen_GB
dc.subjectartificial lighten_GB
dc.subjectstreet lightsen_GB
dc.titleArtificial light at night causes top-down and bottom-up trophic effects on invertebrate populationsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0021-8901
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Applied Ecologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record