dc.contributor.author | Evans, JP | |
dc.contributor.author | Metz, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Anaspure, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, WJ | |
dc.contributor.author | King, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodwin, VA | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, CD | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-29T09:33:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07-18 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Injections into the tendinous portion of the common extensor origin are a common intervention in the treatment of Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy (LET). Clinical trials report a heterogeneous selection of injectate volumes and delivery techniques, with systematic reviews finding no clear consensus. The aim of this study was to assess the intratendinous distribution and surrounding tissue contamination of ultrasound-guided injections into the Common Extensor Tendon (CET) of the elbow. METHODS: Twenty cadaveric elbows were injected by a Consultant Radiologist under Ultrasound guidance. Elbows were randomised to equal groups of 1 or 3 mls of methylene blue injection, delivered using single shot or fenestrated techniques. Following injection, each cadaver underwent a dry arthroscopy and dissection of superficial tissues. The CET was excised, set and divided into 1 mm sections using microtome. Each slice was photographed and analysed to assess spread and pixel density of injectate in four colour graduations. The cross-sectional area of distribution was calculated and compared between groups. RESULTS: In all 20 cadaveric samples, contamination of the joint was noted on arthroscopy and dissection. Injectate spread through over 97% of the cross-sectional area. No differences were found in intratendinous spread of injectate between differing volumes or techniques. CONCLUSION: This study found that commonly used injection volumes and techniques distribute widely throughout cadaveric CETs. There was no improvement when the volume was increased from 1 to 3 mls or between single shot of fenestrated injection techniques. It should be noted that joint contamination using these techniques and volumes may be inevitable. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
The study was funded by the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (funding reference Ltr014PPG) and industry sponsorship from Stryker UK. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 5, article 27 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s40634-018-0142-8 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/33835 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag / European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30022381 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s). 2018. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were mad | en_GB |
dc.title | The spread of Injectate after ultrasound-guided lateral elbow injection - a cadaveric study | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-29T09:33:55Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2197-1153 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | Germany | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the final version of the article. Available from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics | en_GB |