Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCadar, D
dc.contributor.authorLassale, C
dc.contributor.authorDavies, H
dc.contributor.authorLlewellyn, DJ
dc.contributor.authorBatty, GD
dc.contributor.authorSteptoe, A
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-15T12:07:29Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-16
dc.description.abstractImportance: Lower educational attainment is associated with a higher risk of dementia. However, less clear is the extent to which other socioeconomic markers contribute to dementia risk. Objective: To examine the relationship of education, wealth, and area-based deprivation with the incidence of dementia over the last decade in England and investigate differences between people born in different periods. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, a prospective cohort study that is representative of the English population, were used to investigate the associations between markers of socioeconomic status (wealth quintiles and the index of multiple deprivation) and dementia incidence. To investigate outcomes associated with age cohorts, 2 independent groups were derived using a median split (born between 1902-1925 and 1926-1943). Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia as determined by physician diagnosis and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly. Results: A total of 6220 individuals aged 65 years and older enrolled in the study (median [interquartile range] age at baseline, 73.2 [68.1-78.3] years; 3410 [54.8%] female). Of these, 463 individuals (7.4%) had new cases of dementia ascertained in the 12 years between 2002-2003 and 2014-2015. In the cohort born between 1926 and 1943, the hazard of developing dementia was 1.68 times higher (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68 [95% CI, 1.05-2.86]) for those in the lowest wealth quintile compared with those in the highest quintile, independent of education, index of multiple deprivation, and health indicators. Higher hazards were also observed for those in the second-highest quintile of index of multiple deprivation (HR = 1.62 [95% CI, 1.06-2.46]) compared with those in the lowest (least deprived) quintile. Conclusions and Relevance: In an English nationally representative sample, the incidence of dementia appeared to be socioeconomically patterned primarily by the level of wealth. This association was somewhat stronger for participants born in later years.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (grants 5218182, RO1AG7644-01A1, and RO1AG017644). The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing is funded by the National Institute on Aging (grant RO1AG7644) and by a consortium of UK government departments coordinated by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Office for National Statistics. Dr Batty is also supported by the UK Medical Research Council.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 75 (7), pp. 723 - 732en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34304
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Association (AMA)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29799983en_GB
dc.rights© 2018 Cadar D et al. JAMA Psychiatry. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.en_GB
dc.titleIndividual and Area-Based Socioeconomic Factors Associated With Dementia Incidence in England: Evidence From a 12-Year Follow-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageingen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-10-15T12:07:29Z
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited Statesen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the AMA via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionThis article was corrected on July 3, 2018, to clarify ambiguous statements in the Results section of the Abstract and the Findings section of the Key Points that affected interpretation. Correction available at: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1696en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJAMA Psychiatryen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record