Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarnish, M
dc.contributor.authorTørnes, M
dc.contributor.authorNelson-Horne, B
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T09:59:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-18
dc.description.abstractObjectives To provide a 7-year update of the most recent systematic review about the relationships between political features and population health outcomes. Setting Internationally comparative scholarly literature. Data sources Ten scholarly bibliographic databases plus supplementary searches in bibliographies and Google Scholar were used to update a previous systematic review. The final search was conducted in November 2017. Primary and secondary outcome measures Any population health outcome measure, apart from healthcare spending. Results 73 unique publications were identified from the previous systematic review. The database searches to update the literature identified 45 356 raw records with 35 207 remaining following de-duplication. 55 publications were identified from supplementary searches. In total, 258 publications proceeded to full-text review and 176 were included in narrative synthesis. 85 studies were assessed at low risk of bias, 89 at moderate risk of bias and none at high risk of bias. Assessment could not be conducted for two studies that had only book chapters. No meta-analysis was conducted. 102 studies assessed welfare state generosity and 79 found a positive association. Of the 17 studies that assessed political tradition, 15 were found to show a positive association with the left-of-centre tradition. 44 studies assessed democracy and 34 found a positive association. 28 studies assessed globalisation and 14 found a negative association, while seven were positive and seven inconclusive. Conclusions This review concludes that welfare state generosity, left-of-centre democratic political tradition and democracy are generally positively associated with population health. Globalisation may be negatively associated with population health, but the results are less conclusive. It is important for the academic public health community to engage with the political evidence base in its research as well as in stakeholder engagement, in order to facilitate positive outcomes for population health.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 8, article e020886en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020886
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34391
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_GB
dc.titleHow much evidence is there that political factors are related to population health outcomes? An internationally comparative systematic reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-10-23T09:59:00Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record