Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPugh, TAM
dc.contributor.authorJones, CD
dc.contributor.authorHuntingford, C
dc.contributor.authorBurton, C
dc.contributor.authorArneth, A
dc.contributor.authorBrovkin, V
dc.contributor.authorCiais, P
dc.contributor.authorLomas, M
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, E
dc.contributor.authorPiao, SL
dc.contributor.authorSitch, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-24T13:40:35Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-12
dc.description.abstractThe terrestrial biosphere shows substantial inertia in its response to environmental change. Hence, assessments of transient changes in ecosystem properties to 2100 do not capture the full magnitude of the response realized once ecosystems reach an effective equilibrium with the changed environmental boundary conditions. This equilibrium state can be termed the committed state, in contrast to a transient state in which the ecosystem is in disequilibrium. The difference in ecosystem properties between the transient and committed states represents the committed change yet to be realized. Here an ensemble of dynamic global vegetation model simulations was used to assess the changes in tree cover and carbon storage for a variety of committed states, relative to a preindustrial baseline, and to attribute the drivers of uncertainty. Using a subset of simulations, the committed changes in these variables post-2100, assuming climate stabilization, were calculated. The results show large committed changes in tree cover and carbon storage, with model disparities driven by residence time in the tropics, and residence time and productivity in the boreal. Large changes remain ongoing well beyond the end of the 21st century. In boreal ecosystems, the simulated increase in vegetation carbon storage above preindustrial levels was 20–95 Pg C at 2 K of warming, and 45–201 Pg C at 5 K, of which 38–155 Pg C was due to expansion in tree cover. Reducing the large uncertainties in long-term commitment and rate-of-change of terrestrial carbon uptake will be crucial for assessments of emissions budgets consistent with limiting climate change.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis analysis was carried out for the European Commission's Seventh Framework Program grant agreement 282672 (EMBRACE). C. D. J., C. B., and E. R. were supported by the Joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). This work was supported, in part, by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), through the Helmholtz Association and its research program ATMO. Peter Levy is thanked for providing the Hyland simulations.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 12 September 2018en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2018EF000935
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34422
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU) / Wileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2018. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectvegetationen_GB
dc.subjectcarbon cyclingen_GB
dc.subjectcommitted sinken_GB
dc.subjectDGVMen_GB
dc.subjectESMen_GB
dc.titleA Large Committed Long-Term Sink of Carbon due to Vegetation Dynamicsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-10-24T13:40:35Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from AGU via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalEarth's Futureen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record