Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBooth, BBB
dc.contributor.authorHarris, GR
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, JM
dc.contributor.authorHouse, JI
dc.contributor.authorJones, CD
dc.contributor.authorSexton, D
dc.contributor.authorSitch, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-24T15:12:21Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-06
dc.description.abstractUncertainty in the behavior of the carbon cycle is important in driving the range in future projected climate change. Previous comparisons of model responses with historical CO2 observations have suggested a strong constraint on simulated projections that could narrow the range considered plausible. This study uses a new 57-member perturbed parameter ensemble of variants of an Earth system model for three future scenarios, which 1) explores a wider range of potential climate responses than before and 2) includes the impact of past uncertainty in carbon emissions on simulated trends. These two factors represent a more complete exploration of uncertainty, although they lead to a weaker constraint on the range of future CO2 concentrations as compared to earlier studies. Nevertheless, CO2 observations are shown to be effective at narrowing the distribution, excluding 30 of 57 simulations as inconsistent with historical CO2 changes. The perturbed model variants excluded are mainly at the high end of the future projected CO2 changes, with only 8 of the 26 variants projecting RCP8.5 2100 concentrations in excess of 1100 ppm retained. Interestingly, a minority of the high-end variants were able to capture historical CO2 trends, with the large-magnitude response emerging later in the century (owing to high climate sensitivities, strong carbon feedbacks, or both). Comparison with observed CO2 is effective at narrowing both the range and distribution of projections out to the mid-twenty-first century for all scenarios and to 2100 for a scenario with low emissions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Joint U.K. DECC/DEFRA Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). Chris Jones’s contribution was supported by the CRESCENDO project under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, Grant Agreement 641816. Jo House was supported by a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship and EU FP7 Project LUC4C (603542). Stephen Sitch was supported by the EU FP7 through Project LUC4C (GA603542).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 30, pp. 3039 - 3053en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0178.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34430
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Societyen_GB
dc.rights© 2017 American Meteorological Society.en_GB
dc.subjectGreenhouse gasesen_GB
dc.subjectClimate modelsen_GB
dc.subjectEnsemblesen_GB
dc.titleNarrowing the Range of Future Climate Projections Using Historical Observations of Atmospheric CO2en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-10-24T15:12:21Z
dc.identifier.issn0894-8755
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from American Meteorological Society via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Climateen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record