dc.contributor.author | Trudgeon, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Qiu, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, X | |
dc.contributor.author | Mallick, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Taiwo, OO | |
dc.contributor.author | Chakrabarti, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Yufit, V | |
dc.contributor.author | Brandon, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Crevillen-Garcia, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Shah, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-12T10:32:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11-29 | |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this work is to assess the suitability of potential electrolyte additives for
zinc morphology control and improved electrochemical performance of the zinc electrode for
application in zinc based redox flow battery (RFB) systems. Based on existing literature in
the field, sixteen candidates are selected, including four metallic additives, two non-ionic
surfactants and ten quaternary ammonium compounds. The electrochemical performance of
the zinc electrode is assessed using cyclic voltammetry, linear sweep voltammetry and zinc
half-cell cycling tests using chronopotentiometry. Zinc electrodepositions are carried out
using chronopotentiometry in order to assess the effect of additives on zinc morphology with
scanning electron microscopy. Based on zinc reduction and oxidation reaction potentials, the
cycling efficiencies, and the effect on zinc morphology, the most promising additives of those
tested are tetraethylammonium hydroxide and tetraethylammonium bromide. Both provide
smooth and compact zinc deposits and zinc electrode coulombic efficiencies of 95-97 %
without leading to significant changes in the zinc reduction/oxidation overpotentials, yielding anodic and cathodic current densities of 77-78 mA cm-2 and 31-32 mA cm-2 at overpotentials of +/- 50 mV, respectively. In a zinc-nickel flow cell, these additives provide energy efficiencies of 78-79 %, compared with 69 % without an additive. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the EPSRC Supergen Energy Storage Project (grant number: EP/P003494/1) entitled ‘Zinc-Nickel Redox Flow Battery for Energy Storage’; the EPSRC PhD studentship as a Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP); and the support from the College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences in the University of Exeter. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 412, pp. 44-54. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.030 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/34718 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Open Access. Under a Creative Commons license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | |
dc.subject | Electrolyte additive | en_GB |
dc.subject | Zinc electrode | en_GB |
dc.subject | Zinc electrodeposition | en_GB |
dc.subject | Redox flow battery | en_GB |
dc.title | Screening of effective electrolyte additives for zinc-based redox flow battery systems | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 0378-7753 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Power Sources | en_GB |
refterms.dateFOA | 2018-12-18T16:22:17Z | |