Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPreedy, CK
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-13T13:19:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.description.abstractCritics often identify Marlowe and Nashe’s play *Dido Queene of Carthage* as a significant precursor for Shakespeare’s *Antony and Cleopatra*, as well as his more explicitly Virgilian drama *The Tempest*. These three plays are regularly associated with the *Aeneid*, and interpreted within the context of early modern colonial discourse. While the theme of empire-building is of central importance in these dramas, however, the emphasis in all three plays on the staging of Virgilian storms suggest that the *Aeneid*’s prophetic and literary antecedents may be equally significant. Thus Marlowe and Shakespeare’s fictional tempests raise and pursue questions about the nature of theatrical authorship, the concept of a discrete imaginative sphere, and the charged issue of literary legacy or fama. Storms in these plays thus provide a medium through which to engage with and dispute standards of dramatic authority within the context of the purpose-dedicated playhouses, as Marlowe and Shakespeare respond in their drama to contemporary debates about the nature, value and purpose of the theatre.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 5, pp. 151-174en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34745
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPurdue Universityen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.pfw.edu/marlowe/en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreason© 2015 Purdue Universityen_GB
dc.titleFortune’s Breath: Rewriting the Classical Storm in the Drama of Christopher Marlowe and William Shakespeareen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-11-13T13:19:44Z
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscripten_GB
dc.identifier.journalMarlowe Studies: An Annualen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record