Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHawkes, LA
dc.contributor.authorBatbayar, N
dc.contributor.authorButler, PJ
dc.contributor.authorChua, B
dc.contributor.authorFrappell, PB
dc.contributor.authorMeir, JU
dc.contributor.authorMilsom, WK
dc.contributor.authorNatsagdorj, T
dc.contributor.authorParr, N
dc.contributor.authorScott, GR
dc.contributor.authorTakekawa, JY
dc.contributor.authorWikeIski, M
dc.contributor.authorWitt, MJ
dc.contributor.authorBishop, CM
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-20T09:34:28Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-04
dc.description.abstractSYNOPSIS: Exercise at high altitude is extremely challenging, largely due to hypobaric hypoxia (low oxygen levels brought about by low air pressure). In humans, the maximal rate of oxygen consumption decreases with increasing altitude, supporting progressively poorer performance. Bar-headed geese (Anser indicus) are renowned high altitude migrants and, although they appear to minimize altitude during migration where possible, they must fly over the Tibetan Plateau (mean altitude 4800 m) for much of their annual migration. This requires considerable cardiovascular effort, but no study has assessed the extent to which bar-headed geese may train prior to migration for long distances, or for high altitudes. Using implanted loggers that recorded heart rate, acceleration, pressure, and temperature, we found no evidence of training for migration in bar-headed geese. Geese showed no significant change in summed activity per day or maximal activity per day. There was also no significant change in maximum heart rate per day or minimum resting heart rate, which may be evidence of an increase in cardiac stroke volume if all other variables were to remain the same. We discuss the strategies used by bar-headed geese in the context of training undertaken by human mountaineers when preparing for high altitude, noting the differences between their respective cardiovascular physiology.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBSRC; BB/FO15615/1 to C.M.B. and P.J.B.]. Authors were supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) award [W.K.M.], and the FAO through the Animal Health Service EMPRES surveillance program.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 57 (2), pp. 240 - 251en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icb/icx068
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34822
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP) for Society for Integrative and Comparative Biologyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859401en_GB
dc.rightsThe Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved.en_GB
dc.subjectAltitudeen_GB
dc.subjectAnimal Migrationen_GB
dc.subjectAnimalsen_GB
dc.subjectFitness Trackersen_GB
dc.subjectFlight, Animalen_GB
dc.subjectGeeseen_GB
dc.subjectHeart Rateen_GB
dc.subjectOxygen Consumptionen_GB
dc.titleDo Bar-Headed Geese Train for High Altitude Flights?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-11-20T09:34:28Z
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from OUP via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalIntegrative and Comparative Biologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record