Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoshiaris, C
dc.contributor.authorVan den Bruel, A
dc.contributor.authorOke, JL
dc.contributor.authorNicholson, BD
dc.contributor.authorShephard, E
dc.contributor.authorBraddick, M
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-22T14:18:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-30
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a haematological cancer characterised by numerous non-specific symptoms leading to diagnostic delay in a large proportion of patients. AIM: To identify which blood tests are useful in suggesting or excluding a diagnosis of myeloma. DESIGN AND SETTING: A matched case-control study set in UK primary care using routinely collected data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. METHOD: Symptom prevalence and blood tests were analysed up to 5 years before diagnosis in 2703 cases and 12 157 matched controls. Likelihood ratios (LR) were used to classify tests or their combinations as useful rule-in tests (LR+ = ≥5), or rule-out tests (LR- = ≤0.2). RESULTS: Raised plasma viscosity (PV) had an LR+ = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.7 to 2.3; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) 1.9, 95% CI = 1.7 to 2.0; and C-reactive protein (CRP) 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.4. A normal haemoglobin had an LR- = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.45; calcium LR- = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.83; and creatinine LR- = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.83. The test combination with the lowest LR- was all normal haemoglobin with calcium and PV, which had an LR- = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.18, though the LR- for normal haemoglobin and PV together was 0.12 (95% CI = 0.07 to 0.23). CONCLUSION: Plasma viscosity and ESR are better for both ruling in and ruling out the disease compared with C-reactive protein. A combination of a normal ESR or PV and normal haemoglobin is a simple rule-out approach for patients currently being tested in primary care.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis manuscript presents work carried out as part of a DPhil scholarship awarded to Constantinos Koshiaris funded by the Primary Care Research Trust, the University of Oxford, and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford CLAHRC. This article presents independent research funded by the NIHR.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 68, pp. e586 - e593en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp18X698357
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34875
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30104326en_GB
dc.rights© British Journal of General Practice 2018 This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectblooden_GB
dc.subjectcase–control studiesen_GB
dc.subjectdiagnosisen_GB
dc.subjectinflammatoryen_GB
dc.subjectmultiple myelomaen_GB
dc.subjectprimary careen_GB
dc.titleEarly detection of multiple myeloma in primary care using blood tests: a case-control study in primary careen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-11-22T14:18:57Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of General Practiceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record